510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

ACTA

K961735510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 31, 199689-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.6070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Satelec · EBZ Activator, Ultraviolet, For Polymerization

Cleared on Jul 31, 1996 after an 89-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 13 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 31, 1996
Review
89 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EBZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

13 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1997: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2004: 2 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK961735 ACTASatelec · 1996
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 11 of its ownK032465 Mini L.E.D., Model: Mini L.E.D., Model Smartlite MiniSatelec · 2003
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK042703 Cybird Led Curing LightDxm Co., Ltd. · 2004
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK121093 D1 Led Curing Light, Spec 3, Dentronix Led 3000Dxm Co., Ltd. · 2012
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 1 of its ownK173876 Cybird LED Curing LightDxm Co., Ltd. · 2018
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK072181 Mini Led AutofocusSatelec · 2007

Showing 5 of 13 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1997: 12003: 12004: 22005: 12007: 22012: 12013: 12014: 22018: 12020: 1
1997high 2 (2004) · low 0 (1998)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 13 · See all
  • K032465Mini L.E.D., Model: Mini L.E.D., Model Smartlite MiniSatelec · 2003 · cites it directly11descendants
  • K042703Cybird Led Curing LightDxm Co., Ltd. · 2004 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K121093D1 Led Curing Light, Spec 3, Dentronix Led 3000Dxm Co., Ltd. · 2012 · 3 generations on3descendants
  • K173876Cybird LED Curing LightDxm Co., Ltd. · 2018 · 4 generations on1descendant
  • K072181Mini Led AutofocusSatelec · 2007 · 2 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K961735ACTASatelec1996—
+1K032465Mini L.E.D., Model: Mini L.E.D., Model Smartlite MiniSatelec2003—
+2K042703Cybird Led Curing LightDxm Co., Ltd.2004—
+3K121093D1 Led Curing Light, Spec 3, Dentronix Led 3000Dxm Co., Ltd.2012—
+4K173876Cybird LED Curing LightDxm Co., Ltd.2018—
+2K072181Mini Led AutofocusSatelec2007—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
200310
200420
200510
200720
201210
201310
201420
201810
202010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K961735, 1996–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBZ device

  1. #1 K253131 Curing Light (M-Cure 6)score 12.7 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (13)

See all 13

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K032465Mini L.E.D., Model: Mini L.E.D., Model Smartlite MiniSatelec200311
K972006Acta Oem ModuleInteractive Consulting, Inc.19970

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K032465 (Satelec, 2003) has gone furthest, with 11 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EBZ devices

EBZ Activator, Ultraviolet, For Polymerization: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EBZ

4in 2025

2007: 102008: 52009: 42010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 32014: 32015: 42016: 42017: 82018: 22019: 52020: 52021: 12022: 52023: 32024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 10 (2007) · low 1 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBZ

105in 2025

2007: 47 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 69 days median2011: 137 days median2013: 171 days median2014: 289 days median2015: 252 days median2016: 251 days median2017: 158 days median2019: 145 days median2020: 164 days median2022: 144 days median2023: 255 days median2025: 105 days median
2007high 289 (2014) · low 47 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBZ

1in 2022

2012: 12018: 12022: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBZ

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 72009: 52010: 52011: 182012: 202013: 272014: 312015: 82016: 32017: 52018: 32020: 22021: 42022: 52023: 72024: 32025: 1
2007high 31 (2014) · low 0 (2019)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007104701
200857507
200946905
20101—05
20113137018
20121—120
20133171027
20143289031
2015425208
2016425103
2017815805
20182—13
2019514500
2020516402
20211—04
2022514415
2023325507
20241—03
2025410501
20261—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K961735: ACTA.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K961735

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026