510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Model 2188 Coronary Sinus Lead.

K961936510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 15, 199687-day reviewClass III21 CFR 870.3680

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic Vascular · DTB Permanent Pacemaker Electrode

Cleared on Aug 15, 1996 after an 87-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.

Decided
Aug 15, 1996
Review
87 days
Class
Class III
Product code
DTB
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K961936Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DTB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Model 6992A coronary sinus lead
Named without a submission number
—
†K896313Medtronic Implantable Pacing Leads W/IS-1 Conn.Medtronic Vascular1990—
†P830061Steroid Tip (TM) Model 4503&4003 Transvenous PacingMedtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management1986—
†K780621Lead, Pacing, Atrial, Endocardial, TinedMedtronic Vascular1978—
†K772104Pacing Lead Model 6991AMedtronic Vascular1977—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All DTB devices

DTB Permanent Pacemaker Electrode: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DTB

1in 2025

2015: 32016: 82017: 52018: 62019: 72020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 72024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 8 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DTB

Too few DTB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DTB

1in 2015

2008: 12009: 22010: 22015: 1
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DTB

25,591in 2025

2007: 5,4012008: 6,4692009: 7,5652010: 14,2852011: 12,5552012: 12,2302013: 10,1022014: 13,3242015: 11,0712016: 11,8392017: 11,4952018: 15,2092019: 16,8122020: 17,8592021: 18,4422022: 19,4442023: 34,5422024: 25,6892025: 25,591
2007high 34,542 (2023) · low 5,401 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DTB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—05,401
20080—16,469
20090—27,565
20100—214,285
20110—012,555
20120—012,230
20130—010,102
20140—013,324
20153—111,071
20168—011,839
20175—011,495
20186—015,209
20197—016,812
20206—017,859
20213—018,442
20224—019,444
20237—034,542
20243—025,689
20251—025,591
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Model 2188 coronary sinus lead is designed for atrial pacing and sensing in the coronary sinus. The lead has application where permanent atrial or dual-chamber pacing systems are indicated.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K961936: Model 2188 Coronary Sinus Lead..” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K961936

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026