510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2018

Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon 2-Way Catheter

K962472510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 27, 199663-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1620Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Rusch Intl. · FAP Cystometric Gas (Carbon-Dioxide) On Hydraulic Device

Cleared on Aug 27, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K952573 (Rusch Intl., 1995) and 1 other predicate after a 63-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Aug 27, 1996
Review
63 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FAP
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K912451 (1991). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestorK912451 · Urodynamic Rectal Balloon · Cook Urological, Inc. · 199119901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K912451 · Urodynamic Rectal Balloon · Cook Urological, Inc. · 19910
  1. Root · 1 generation backK912451 Urodynamic Rectal BalloonCook Urological, Inc. · 1991
  2. This deviceK962472 Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon 2-Way CatheterRusch Intl. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K912451Urodynamic Rectal BalloonCook Urological, Inc.1991—
0 (this device)K962472Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon 2-Way CatheterRusch Intl.1996—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K962472, 1991–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FAP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K952573Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon Catheter
Our OCR of the scanned summary read K852573, FDA’s number for Technicon RA-1000 System Analyte Theophylline (Technicon Instruments Corp.). Corrected to the number one digit away whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon Catheter”.
Rusch Intl.1995—
*K912451Urodynamic Rectal Balloon
Summary page 1
…Devices Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon Catheter - K852573 Porges Urodynamic Rectal Balloon Catheter - Preamendment Cook Urological Urodynamic Rectal Balloon Catheter - K912451 4 Description of Device The Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon 2-way Catheter consists of a double lumen polyvinyl chloride tube u…
Cook Urological, Inc.1991—
*—Porges Urodynamic Rectal Balloon Catheter
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 15, 2018Class IIZ-1368-2018Employee errorThese products contain latex, but the following statement is not included on any level of product packaging: Caution: This Product Contains Natural Rubber Latex Which May Cause Allergic Reactions.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All FAP devices

FAP Cystometric Gas (Carbon-Dioxide) On Hydraulic Device: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FAP

1in 2012

2012: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FAP

Too few FAP 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FAP

No recall names FAP since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · FAP

36in 2025

2009: 12016: 12018: 22024: 22025: 36
2007high 36 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FAP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—01
20100—00
20110—00
20121—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—01
20170—00
20180—02
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—02
20250—036
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon 2-way Catheter is intended to provide a fluid conduit for urodynamic studies, where the detrusor pressure is to be calculated from rectal pressure.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K962472: Rusch Urodynamic Rectal Balloon 2-Way Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K962472

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026