510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow Insufflator

K962683510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 10, 1997184-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.1730

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Deknatel, Inc. · HIF Insufflator, Laparoscopic

Cleared on Jan 10, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K920986 (Snowden-Pencer, 1992) and 1 other predicate after a 184-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992.

Decided
Jan 10, 1997
Review
184 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HIF
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K920986 (1992). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestorK920986 · Snowden-Pencer High Flow Insufflator, SP/88-9700 · Snowden-Pencer · 199219901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K920986 · Snowden-Pencer High Flow Insufflator, SP/88-9700 · Snowden-Pencer · 19920
  1. Root · 1 generation backK920986 Snowden-Pencer High Flow Insufflator, SP/88-9700Snowden-Pencer · 1992
  2. This deviceK962683 Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow InsufflatorDeknatel, Inc. · 1997
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K920986Snowden-Pencer High Flow Insufflator, SP/88-9700Snowden-Pencer1992—
0 (this device)K962683Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow InsufflatorDeknatel, Inc.1997—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K962683, 1992–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HIF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HIF device

  1. #1 K250388 Endoflator +score 15.8 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K920986Snowden-Pencer High Flow Insufflator, SP/88-9700
Summary page 2
…ntended use to other high flow insufflators currently in commercial distribution in the United States. The predecessor Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow Insufflator (K920986) had many of the identical features to the current model device with the exception of the continuous monitoring of patient pressu…
Snowden-Pencer1992—
*K952508Flow-Therme, Wisap #7642
Summary page 2
…been added to the device in order to improve device performance and user convenience. Other electronic high flow insufflators, such as the WISAP Flow Therme Insufflator (K952508) also include a CO, heater. 6. DEVICE TESTING Performance testing conducted on the Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow Insuff…
Wisap Gesellschaft Fur Wissenschaftl. App. Bau Mbh1995—

Also cleared against K920986: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K920986.

How does its category compare?

All HIF devices

HIF Insufflator, Laparoscopic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HIF

3in 2025

2007: 42008: 22009: 42010: 22011: 52012: 52013: 22014: 22015: 22016: 32017: 52018: 32019: 22020: 42021: 12022: 12023: 72024: 42025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 7 (2023) · low 1 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HIF

210in 2025

2007: 140 days median2009: 191 days median2011: 128 days median2012: 138 days median2016: 88 days median2017: 242 days median2018: 207 days median2020: 64 days median2023: 134 days median2024: 170 days median2025: 210 days median2026 (partial year): 265 days median
2007high 265 (2026) · low 64 (2020)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HIF

12so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12016: 12018: 12023: 1, 1 Class I2026 (partial year): 12
2007high 12 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HIF

1,507in 2025

2007: 82008: 142009: 212010: 412011: 442012: 382013: 402014: 432015: 302016: 722017: 682018: 972019: 1282020: 3602021: 6542022: 6672023: 8902024: 1,4832025: 1,507
2007high 1,507 (2025) · low 8 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HIF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007414008
20082—114
20094191021
20102—041
20115128044
20125138038
20132—040
20142—043
20152—030
2016388172
20175242068
20183207197
20192—0128
20204640360
20211—0654
20221—0667
202371341 (1)890
2024417001,483
2025321001,507
2026326512—

What is it indicated for?

The Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow Insufflator is intended to provide intra-abdominal distention during laparoscopic surgery.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K962683: Snowden-Pencer Computerized High Flow Insufflator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K962683

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026