510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Flex-Lase 600 Series Ion Laser System

K963389510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 26, 199690-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

American Laser Medical · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Nov 26, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K913569 (Hgm Medical Laser Systems, Inc., 1991) and 1 other predicate after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1990.

Decided
Nov 26, 1996
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K903883 (1990). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1991: 1 other ancestorK903883 · Vasculase (R) Copper Vapor Laser Syst, Pigment Les · Metatech Corp. · 199019901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K903883 · Vasculase (R) Copper Vapor Laser Syst, Pigment Les · Metatech Corp. · 19900
  1. Root · 1 generation backK903883 Vasculase (R) Copper Vapor Laser Syst, Pigment LesMetatech Corp. · 1990
  2. This deviceK963389 Flex-Lase 600 Series Ion Laser SystemAmerican Laser Medical · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K903883Vasculase (R) Copper Vapor Laser Syst, Pigment LesMetatech Corp.1990—
0 (this device)K963389Flex-Lase 600 Series Ion Laser SystemAmerican Laser Medical1996—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K963389, 1990–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
Kept off the family treeK913428NGM Spectrum K1
Not in FDA’s 510(k), De Novo or PMA lists as we hold them (a misreading, a typo, or a number FDA does not list), so it is kept off the family tree
Summary page 6
…(same) (same) (same) legions heman- hemangioma gioma, Strawberry Straw- hemangioma berry Telangec- heman- tasia gioma, Roeacea Telangec- tasia, Rosacea K Number K913428, K903883 na K913569 11,8836 ~ 18:57 3L 334 2352 Laser BEquivalency Table Pigmented Lesions NO. 655 M FLE…
*K913569Compac a, Elite a, Elite a Plus, Surgica a
Summary page 6
…legions heman- hemangioma gioma, Strawberry Straw- hemangioma berry Telangec- heman- tasia gioma, Roeacea Telangec- tasia, Rosacea K Number K913428, K903883 na K913569 11,8836 ~ 18:57 3L 334 2352 Laser BEquivalency Table Pigmented Lesions NO. 655 M FLEXI-LASE | FLEX-LASE H…
Hgm Medical Laser Systems, Inc.19911
*K903883Vasculase (R) Copper Vapor Laser Syst, Pigment Les
Summary page 6
…same) (same) legions heman- hemangioma gioma, Strawberry Straw- hemangioma berry Telangec- heman- tasia gioma, Roeacea Telangec- tasia, Rosacea K Number K913428, K903883 na K913569 11,8836 ~ 18:57 3L 334 2352 Laser BEquivalency Table Pigmented Lesions NO. 655 M FLEXI-LASE |…
Metatech Corp.1990—
*—Coherent Artisan
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K913569: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K913569.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Flex-lase 600 Ion Laser is intended for use in the treatment of selected pigmented and vascularized lesions of the skin. Representative indications for use are: Flex-Lase Model 640 Laser System For vascular lesions: (Yellow - 568 nm) 1. Capillary Hemangioma (port wine hemangioma) 2. Strawberry hemangioma 3. Telangectasia 4. Rosacea For pigmented lesions: (Yellow/Green - 568 nm and 520-530 nm) Freckles Age Spots Cafe-au-lait Lentigo Flex-Lase Model…

Read the full statement (110 words)

The Flex-lase 600 Ion Laser is intended for use in the treatment of selected pigmented and vascularized lesions of the skin. Representative indications for use are:

Flex-Lase Model 640 Laser System

For vascular lesions: (Yellow - 568 nm)

1. Capillary Hemangioma (port wine hemangioma)

2. Strawberry hemangioma

3. Telangectasia

4. Rosacea

For pigmented lesions: (Yellow/Green - 568 nm and 520-530 nm)

Freckles

Age Spots

Cafe-au-lait

Lentigo

Flex-Lase Model 620 Laser System

For Vascular lesions: (Blue/Green - 488 nm and 514.5 nm)

1. Capillary Hemangioma (port wine hemangioma)

2. Strawberry Hemangioma

3. Telangectasia

4. Rosacea

For pigmented lesions: (Green - 514.5 nm)

1. Freckles

2. Age Spots

3. Cafe-au-lait

4. Lentigo

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K963389: Flex-Lase 600 Series Ion Laser System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K963389

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026