510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cedia Phenytoin II Assay

K963840510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 20, 199657-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.3350

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boehringer Mannheim Corp. · DIP Enzyme Immunoassay, Diphenylhydantoin

Cleared on Nov 20, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K905689 (Microgenics Corp., 1991) after a 57-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 20, 1996
Review
57 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DIP
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K905689 (1991). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant clearedK905689 · Cedia Phenytoin Assay · Microgenics Corp. · 19911990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K905689 · Cedia Phenytoin Assay · Microgenics Corp. · 19910
  1. Root · 1 generation backK905689 Cedia Phenytoin AssayMicrogenics Corp. · 1991
  2. This deviceK963840 Cedia Phenytoin II AssayBoehringer Mannheim Corp. · 1996
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK030428 Roche Online TDM PhenytoinRoche Diagnostics Corp. · 2003 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K030428Roche Online TDM PhenytoinRoche Diagnostics Corp. · 2003 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K905689Cedia Phenytoin AssayMicrogenics Corp.1991—
0 (this device)K963840Cedia Phenytoin II AssayBoehringer Mannheim Corp.1996—
+1K030428Roche Online TDM PhenytoinRoche Diagnostics Corp.20032

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K963840, 1991–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DIP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K905689Cedia Phenytoin Assay
Summary page 1
…ent to other products in commercial distribution intended for similar use. Most notably it is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed CEDIA® Phenytoin Assay (K905689). page 26 4. Device Description s. Intended use 6. Comparison to predicate device Diagnostics The CEDIA® Phe…
Microgenics Corp.1991—

Also cleared against K905689: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K030428Roche Online TDM PhenytoinRoche Diagnostics Corp.20030

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K030428 (Roche Diagnostics Corp., 2003) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K905689.

How does its category compare?

All DIP devices

DIP Enzyme Immunoassay, Diphenylhydantoin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DIP

1in 2008

2007: 12008: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DIP

Too few DIP 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DIP

1in 2017

2008: 12013: 32014: 22017: 1
2007high 3 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DIP

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 202009: 102010: 592011: 1042012: 512013: 1632014: 572015: 652016: 692017: 552018: 792019: 252020: 172021: 492022: 182023: 422024: 52025: 2
2007high 163 (2013) · low 2 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DIP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—02
20081—120
20090—010
20100—059
20110—0104
20120—051
20130—3163
20140—257
20150—065
20160—069
20170—155
20180—079
20190—025
20200—017
20210—049
20220—018
20230—042
20240—05
20250—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of phenytoin in human serum and plasma.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K963840: Cedia Phenytoin II Assay.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K963840

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026