510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Titanium Liberty Posterior Spinal System

K964254510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 21, 1997179-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sofamor Danek USA,Inc. · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Apr 21, 1997 after a 179-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Apr 21, 1997
Review
179 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK964254 Titanium Liberty Posterior Spinal SystemSofamor Danek USA,Inc. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK980928 Synthes Spine Universal Spinal Hook, Rod, Pedicle/Sacral Screw…Synthes Spine · 1998

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K980928Synthes Spine Universal Spinal Hook, Rod, Pedicle/Sacral Screw Fixation SystemSynthes Spine · 1998 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K964254Titanium Liberty Posterior Spinal SystemSofamor Danek USA,Inc.1997—
+1K980928Synthes Spine Universal Spinal Hook, Rod, Pedicle/Sacral Screw Fixation SystemSynthes Spine1998—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K964254, 1997–1998Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K980928Synthes Spine Universal Spinal Hook, Rod, Pedicle/Sacral Screw Fixation SystemSynthes Spine19980

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K980928 (Synthes Spine, 1998) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System is intended to provide temporary stabilization and to help augment the development of a solid spinal fusion. Except for situations using pedicle screws in patients, (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar — first sacral (L5-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine…

Read the full statement (364 words)

The LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System is intended to provide temporary stabilization and to help augment the development of a solid spinal fusion. Except for situations using pedicle screws in patients, (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar — first sacral (L5-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 and below); and (d) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass, the specific indications for the LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System are the following:

1. Degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies).

Pseudoarthrosis

Stenosis

Spondylolisthesis

Spinal deformities: scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis

Fracture

Unsuccessful previous attempts at spinal fusion

Tumor resection

The LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System is intended for use only in the thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral levels of the posterior spine. The LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System is limited to non-cervical use. The LIBERTY™ Screws and TSRH® Variable Angle Screws, when used as pedicle screws with the LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System, is intended only for patients: (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar - first sacral (L5-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine; and (d) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass. When used for pedicle screw fixation as described above, the screws are indicated only for insertion no higher than L3 and not lower than the sacrum. Otherwise the LIBERTY™ screws and TSRH® Variable Angle Screws, when used with the LIBERTY™ Posterior Spinal System, are intended for sacral/iliac attachment only. The CCD™ Screws for Sacral Block are intended for sacral/iliac attachment only. All of the CD HORIZON™ and LIBERTY™ hooks are intended for thoracic and/or lumbar attachment only. TSRH® CROSSLINK® plates, CD HORIZON™ Low Profile MULTI-SPAN™ CROSSLINK® plates, and CCD™ Transverse links, domino, and cylinder are intended for posterior thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral use only.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K964254: Titanium Liberty Posterior Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K964254

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026