510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cedia Dau Multi-Drug Control Cedia Dau Specialty Control Set 1

K965157510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 17, 199725-day reviewClass I21 CFR 862.3280

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boehringer Mannheim Corp. · DIF Drug Mixture Control Materials

Cleared on Jan 17, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K935062 (Medical Analysis Systems, Inc., 1994) and 1 other predicate after a 25-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994.

Decided
Jan 17, 1997
Review
25 days
Class
Class I
Product code
DIF
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K935062 (1994). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestorK935062 · Mas Liquid Urinalysis Control · Medical Analysis Systems, Inc. · 199419901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K935062 · Mas Liquid Urinalysis Control · Medical Analysis Systems, Inc. · 19940
  1. Root · 1 generation backK935062 Mas Liquid Urinalysis ControlMedical Analysis Systems, Inc. · 1994
  2. This deviceK965157 Cedia Dau Multi-Drug Control Cedia Dau Specialty Control Set 1Boehringer Mannheim Corp. · 1997
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K935062Mas Liquid Urinalysis ControlMedical Analysis Systems, Inc.1994—
0 (this device)K965157Cedia Dau Multi-Drug Control Cedia Dau Specialty Control Set 1Boehringer Mannheim Corp.1997—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K965157, 1994–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DIF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K935062Mas Liquid Urinalysis Control
Summary page 1
…s (unassayed) - The Boehsinger Mannheim modified Multi-Drug Control Set is substantially - eduivalent to the Medical Analysis Systems (MAS) Liquid Urinalysis Controls (K935062). The Boehringer Mannheim modified Specialty Control Set 1 is substantially equivalent to the Multi-Drug Control Set (K951135).…
Medical Analysis Systems, Inc.1994—
*K951135Multi-Drug Control Set
Summary page 1
…s Systems (MAS) Liquid Urinalysis Controls (K935062). The Boehringer Mannheim modified Specialty Control Set 1 is substantially equivalent to the Multi-Drug Control Set (K951135). The Multi-Drug Control Set and the Specialty Control Set 1 are manufactured using human urine, multiple drugs of abuse, stabil…
Microgenics Corp.1995—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All DIF devices

DIF Drug Mixture Control Materials: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DIF

1in 2016

2007: 12008: 22010: 12011: 12012: 32013: 22016: 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DIF

35in 2012

2012: 35 days median
2007high 35 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DIF

1in 2021

2011: 12013: 12017: 52021: 1
2007high 5 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DIF

1in 2016

2011: 12012: 32016: 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DIF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20082—00
20090—00
20101—00
20111—11
201233503
20132—10
20140—00
20150—00
20161—01
20170—50
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—10
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The modified Multi-Drug Control Set and the modified Specialty Control Set 1 are intended to be used as quality control material to monitor drugs of abuse assays.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K965157: Cedia Dau Multi-Drug Control Cedia Dau Specialty Control Set 1.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K965157

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026