510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Liberty Plus System (PFS-300)/Vaginal Probe, Liberty Plus (PFS-044)

K970077510(k) TraditionalCleared May 23, 1997134-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5320

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Utah Medical Products, Inc. · KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence

Cleared on May 23, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K960496 (Utah Medical Products, Inc., 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 134-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1989.

Decided
May 23, 1997
Review
134 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPI
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K891773 (1989). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestorK891773 · Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin Inconti · Hollister, Inc. · 1989K960496 · Liberty Lite PFS System · Utah Medical Products, Inc. · 19961986198819901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K960496 · Liberty Lite PFS System · Utah Medical Products, Inc. · 1996K891773 · Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin Inconti · Hollister, Inc. · 19890
  1. Root · 2 generations backK891773 Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin IncontiHollister, Inc. · 1989
  2. 1 generation backK960496 Liberty Lite PFS SystemUtah Medical Products, Inc. · 1996
  3. This deviceK970077 Liberty Plus System (PFS-300)/Vaginal Probe, Liberty Plus (PFS-044)Utah Medical Products, Inc. · 1997
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K891773Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin IncontiHollister, Inc.1989—
−1K960496Liberty Lite PFS SystemUtah Medical Products, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K970077Liberty Plus System (PFS-300)/Vaginal Probe, Liberty Plus (PFS-044)Utah Medical Products, Inc.1997—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
199610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K970077, 1989–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KPI device

  1. #1 K262353 BTL-299-Fscore 14.8 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960496Liberty Lite PFS System
Summary page 1
…ical Products, Inc. (UMP) Liberty Plus System (PFS-300) is substantially equivalent to a combination of the UMP Liberty PFS System (PFS-200), cleared for marketing under K960496, with the Cardio Design Pty Ltd PFX Pelvic Floor Exerciser, cleared for marketing under K945611. The device consists of a hand h…
Utah Medical Products, Inc.1996—
*K945611Peritron
Summary page 1
…tion of the UMP Liberty PFS System (PFS-200), cleared for marketing under K960496, with the Cardio Design Pty Ltd PFX Pelvic Floor Exerciser, cleared for marketing under K945611. The device consists of a hand held electrostimulation unit and an injection molded thermoplastic applicator that supports two s…
Cardio Design Pty., Ltd.1996—

Also cleared against K960496: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.8 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K960496.

How does its category compare?

All KPI devices

KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KPI

7so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 12009: 22011: 12012: 22013: 12014: 32015: 62016: 32017: 12018: 32019: 22020: 12021: 32022: 32023: 32024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 7
2007high 7 (2026) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPI

263in 2025

2014: 57 days median2015: 260 days median2016: 89 days median2018: 304 days median2021: 217 days median2022: 181 days median2023: 197 days median2024: 172 days median2025: 263 days median2026 (partial year): 248 days median
2007high 304 (2018) · low 57 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KPI

No recall names KPI since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KPI

2in 2024

2013: 12015: 22017: 42019: 22020: 32021: 12022: 22023: 62024: 2
2007high 6 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20081—00
20092—00
20100—00
20111—00
20122—00
20131—01
201435700
2015626002
201638900
20171—04
2018330400
20192—02
20201—03
2021321701
2022318102
2023319706
2024417202
2025426300
202672480—

What is it indicated for?

This device is intended as therapeutic aid in the conservative treatment of stress incontinence, urge incontinence or mixed stress and urge incontinence in women. Patients appropriate for this therapy should be selected using the following criteria: Indications: • Good general health, both mentally and physically. • Urge incontinence due to detrusor instability or of idiopathic origin. • Stress incontinence not associated with intrinsic sphincter…

Read the full statement (169 words)

This device is intended as therapeutic aid in the conservative treatment of stress incontinence, urge incontinence or mixed stress and urge incontinence in women. Patients appropriate for this therapy should be selected using the following criteria:

Indications:

• Good general health, both mentally and physically.

• Urge incontinence due to detrusor instability or of idiopathic origin.

• Stress incontinence not associated with intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

• Mixed incontinence.

• Ability of patient to understand and demonstrate understanding of the use of the Liberty Plus System.

• Willingness to comply with the therapy plan.

Contraindications:

• Use of a cardiac pacemaker, or a history of rate or conductive disturbances.

• Neurological deficiency that would not permit proper sensory perception or stimulation.

• Currently pregnant or attempting to get pregnant.

• Anatomical vaginal structure that does not permit proper and complete placement of the vaginal probe.

• Irregular menstrual bleeding cycles.

• Any urinary or vaginal infections, localized lesions or other undiagnosed symptoms.

• History of urinary retention or current symptoms.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K970077: Liberty Plus System (PFS-300)/Vaginal Probe, Liberty Plus (PFS-044).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K970077

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026