510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Innerwear/Extrawear/Jimmy-O Raincoat/Zeus/Gentlemen's Choice/Jasmine/Drink/Naughty

K970791510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 3, 199791-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.5310

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Custom Services Intl., Inc. · LTZ Condom With Nonoxynol-9

Cleared on Jun 3, 1997 after a 91-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jun 3, 1997
Review
91 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LTZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1997: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK970791 Innerwear/Extrawear/Jimmy-O Raincoat/Zeus/Gentlemen's…Custom Services Intl., Inc. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK972430 Extrawear, Gentlemen's Choice W/Nonoxynol-9Custom Services Intl., Inc. · 1997

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K972430Extrawear, Gentlemen's Choice W/Nonoxynol-9Custom Services Intl., Inc. · 1997 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K970791Innerwear/Extrawear/Jimmy-O Raincoat/Zeus/Gentlemen's…Custom Services Intl., Inc.1997—
+1K972430Extrawear, Gentlemen's Choice W/Nonoxynol-9Custom Services Intl., Inc.1997—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K970791, 1997–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LTZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K972430Extrawear, Gentlemen's Choice W/Nonoxynol-9Custom Services Intl., Inc.19970

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K972430 (Custom Services Intl., Inc., 1997) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LTZ devices

LTZ Condom With Nonoxynol-9: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LTZ

FDA has decided no LTZ device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · LTZ

Too few LTZ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LTZ

No recall names LTZ since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LTZ

1in 2014

2012: 12014: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LTZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—01
20130—00
20140—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Extra strength lubricated rubrer male condom with Nonoxynol-9 for use as a contraceptive and prophylactic. Additional Statement: “Labdratory tests of physical properties show the ExtraWear condom is stronger than the InnerWear condom. However, the breakage rate during sex has not been tested.” Additional Statement: This dondom contains a latex condom and 8 spermicidal lubricant. The spermicide, Nonoxyno!-9, reduces the number of active sperm, thereby…

Read the full statement (114 words)

Extra strength lubricated rubrer male condom with Nonoxynol-9 for use as a contraceptive and prophylactic.

Additional Statement: “Labdratory tests of physical properties show the ExtraWear condom is stronger than the InnerWear condom. However, the breakage rate during sex has not been tested.”

Additional Statement: This dondom contains a latex condom and 8 spermicidal lubricant. The spermicide, Nonoxyno!-9, reduces the number of active sperm, thereby decreasing the risk of pregnancy if you lose your efection before withdrawal and some semen spill outside the condom. However the extent of the decreased risk has not been established. This condom should not be used sas a substitute er the combined use of a vaginal spermicide and a condom

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K970791: Innerwear/Extrawear/Jimmy-O Raincoat/Zeus/Gentlemen's Choice/Jasmine/Drink/Naughty.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K970791

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026