510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

3M Red Dot 2560 & 2570 Monitoring Electrodes

K970796510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 9, 199736-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2360Recalls 6

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

3M Healthcare · DRX Electrode, Electrocardiograph

Cleared on Apr 9, 1997 after a 36-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 6 times.

Decided
Apr 9, 1997
Review
36 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRX
Recalls
6
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK970796 3M Red Dot 2560 & 2570 Monitoring Electrodes3M Healthcare · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK062760 Ori F6T Dry Ecg Monitoring ElectrodeOrbital Research, Inc. · 2006

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K062760Ori F6T Dry Ecg Monitoring ElectrodeOrbital Research, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K9707963M Red Dot 2560 & 2570 Monitoring Electrodes3M Healthcare1997—
+1K062760Ori F6T Dry Ecg Monitoring ElectrodeOrbital Research, Inc.2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K970796, 1997–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K062760Ori F6T Dry Ecg Monitoring ElectrodeOrbital Research, Inc.20060

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Sep 15, 2020Class IIZ-0421-2021Process controlCorrosion could cause performance failures in the product.
Sep 15, 2020Class IIZ-0423-2021Process controlCorrosion could cause performance failures in the product.
Sep 15, 2020Class IIZ-0422-2021Process controlCorrosion could cause performance failures in the product.
Sep 15, 2020Class IIZ-0419-2021Process controlCorrosion could cause performance failures in the product.
Sep 15, 2020Class IIZ-0420-2021Process controlCorrosion could cause performance failures in the product.
Jul 27, 2010Not classifiedZ-2383-2010Process controlThe sensing element of the 3M Red Dot Monitoring Electrode, Catalog # 2560 and Novaplus Universal Monitoring Electrode #V2560 may have corrosion. In an emergency situation where defibrillation is necessary and electrodes are already in…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K062760 (Orbital Research, Inc., 2006) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DRX devices

DRX Electrode, Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DRX

1in 2017

2007: 32008: 32009: 72010: 52013: 12014: 12017: 1
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRX

78in 2010

2007: 147 days median2008: 17 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 78 days median
2007high 147 (2007) · low 17 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRX

6in 2022

2010: 42015: 12020: 52021: 12022: 6
2007high 6 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRX

250in 2025

2007: 472008: 152009: 362010: 482011: 802012: 412013: 702014: 272015: 582016: 372017: 552018: 432019: 502020: 532021: 552022: 612023: 1132024: 612025: 250
2007high 250 (2025) · low 15 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073147047
2008317015
2009789036
2010578448
20110—080
20120—041
20131—070
20141—027
20150—158
20160—037
20171—055
20180—043
20190—050
20200—553
20210—155
20220—661
20230—0113
20240—061
20250—0250
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The 3M Red Dot™ 2560 & 2570 Monitoring Electrodes are intended for use in ECG Monitoring. The 2560 and 2570 electrodes can be used in all ECG applications where standard ECG monitoring electrodes are used. These electrodes can be used for short term and long term (up to 5 Days) monitoring.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K970796: 3M Red Dot 2560 & 2570 Monitoring Electrodes.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K970796

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026