510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Isg Family of Viewing Wands

K970865510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 4, 199786-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Jun 4, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K960714 (I.S.G. Technologies, Inc., 1996) and 1 other predicate after an 86-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 4, 1997
Review
86 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K911783 (1994). 5 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 2 other ancestors1999: 2 descendants cleared1998: 1 descendant clearedK911783 · Allegro Viewing Wand · I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1994K960714 · Isg Viewing Wand · I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 19961990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K960714 · Isg Viewing Wand · I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1996K911783 · Allegro Viewing Wand · I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 19940
  1. Root · 2 generations backK911783 Allegro Viewing WandI.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK960714 Isg Viewing WandI.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1996
  3. This deviceK970865 Isg Family of Viewing WandsI.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1997
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK973684 Leksell Viewscope, Leksell Surgiscope, Leksell FreehandElekta Instrument AB · 1998
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK992882 Leksell Image Guidance Surgical System, View Scope…Elekta Instrument AB · 1999
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK981480 Philips EasyguidePhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1999

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K973684Leksell Viewscope, Leksell Surgiscope, Leksell FreehandElekta Instrument AB · 1998 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K992882Leksell Image Guidance Surgical System, View Scope, Surgiscope,Elekta InsightElekta Instrument AB · 1999 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K981480Philips EasyguidePhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1999 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K911783Allegro Viewing WandI.S.G. Technologies, Inc.1994—
−1K960714Isg Viewing WandI.S.G. Technologies, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K970865Isg Family of Viewing WandsI.S.G. Technologies, Inc.1997—
+1K973684Leksell Viewscope, Leksell Surgiscope, Leksell FreehandElekta Instrument AB1998—
+2K992882Leksell Image Guidance Surgical System, View Scope, Surgiscope,Elekta InsightElekta Instrument AB1999—
+1K981480Philips EasyguidePhilips Medical Systems, Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199520
199610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
199920
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K970865, 1994–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960714Isg Viewing Wand
Summary page 1
…intra-operatively. V. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE The spinal application as described in this submission is a line (application) extension to the Family of Viewing Wands (K960714) and is substantially equivalent to other devices (Stealth Station - K954276) within the classification of diagnostic devices (21…
I.S.G. Technologies, Inc.1996—
*K954276Stealthstation
Summary page 1
…scribed in this submission is a line (application) extension to the Family of Viewing Wands (K960714) and is substantially equivalent to other devices (Stealth Station - K954276) within the classification of diagnostic devices (21CFR 882.4560) that have been reviewed under the provisions of the Medical Dev…
Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.19961

Also cleared against K960714: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K973684Leksell Viewscope, Leksell Surgiscope, Leksell FreehandElekta Instrument AB19981
K981480Philips EasyguidePhilips Medical Systems, Inc.19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 3 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K973684 (Elekta Instrument AB, 1998) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K960714.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

The Family of Viewing Wands, (including cranial and spinal applications) is comprised of a medical workstation and an integrated position sensing probe, is intended to be used pre-operatively and intra-operatively to perform the following functions: process and display pre-operatively radiographic images on a momtor; provide intra-operative image information based on the position and orientation of a user directed probe; allow for the optical integration…

Read the full statement (335 words)

The Family of Viewing Wands, (including cranial and spinal applications) is comprised of a medical workstation and an integrated position sensing probe, is intended to be used pre-operatively and intra-operatively to perform the following functions:

process and display pre-operatively radiographic images on a momtor;

provide intra-operative image information based on the position and orientation of a user directed probe;

allow for the optical integration and usage of different position sensing technologies (¢.g. articulated arm, infrared frechand) and surgical probes (handheld pointers);

store/retrieve image data on computer access media (e.g. hard disks, archive media); and

transmit data over local area and wide arca nctworks.

Circumstances:

The Family of Viewing Wands is intended to be used pre-operatively:

whien more than one approach (e.g. eatry point, trajectory, craniotomy size, screw placement) is being considered;

when determining the size of any instrumentation;

and intra-operatively, when:

the target, trajectory, or approach is in a region with few anatomical landmarks (e.g. subcortical brain) or with complex anatomy (e.g. scoliosis, fractures, deformuty);

the target; trajectory, or-approach is net entircly exposed (e.g. posterior approach for screw placement);

the target, trajectory, or approach is in a region wher¢ the normal landmarks have been distorted either by disease (e.g. degenerative disease, osteophytes) or by previous surgery;

the target, trajectory, or approach is in close proximity to critical structures (e.g. venous sinuses, air sinuses, spinal ncrve roots or blood vessels) which must be avoided or negotiated; or

the target’s delineation is important and will not move significantly during the approach (e.g. skull based tumors, sinus diseases, corpus callosotomies, spinal cord tumors).

Disease or Conditions:

The Family of Viewing Wands is indicated for patients who have space-occupying lesions or malformations (both soft tissue and osseous) in the head.

It is also indicated for patients who require decompressive or reconstructive surgery of the spine, or who have imaged space-occupying lesions or malformations in the spine.

The Family of Viewing Wands is contraindicated for patients suspected of having Creutzfeld-Jakob’s discasc if adequate sterilization of the instrument cannot be assured.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K970865: Isg Family of Viewing Wands.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K970865

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026