510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Osteonics Acetabular Wedge System

K971422510(k) TraditionalCleared May 22, 199735-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Osteonics Corp. · MEH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-Porous, Calcium Phosphate

Cleared on May 22, 1997 after a 35-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 22 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 22, 1997
Review
35 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MEH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

22 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2024: 3 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2022: 4 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2025: 5 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK971422 Osteonics Acetabular Wedge SystemOsteonics Corp. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 21 of its ownK102019 Restoration Acetabular Wedge AugmentsHowmedica Osteonics · 2011 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 17 of its ownK153345 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics · 2016 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 8 of its ownK173499 Exeter V40 Femoral Stem Hip System, Orthinox V40 Femoral HeadsStryker Orthopaedics · 2018 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 7 of its ownK182468 Trident X3 Acetabular Inserts, ADM and MDM X3 Acetabular Inserts…Howmedica Osteonics Corp. A.K.A. Stryker Orthopaedics · 2019
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 6 of its ownK220731 Insignia Hip Stem, Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal StemStryker · 2022

Showing 5 of 22 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12016: 12018: 12019: 22020: 12021: 12022: 42023: 12024: 32025: 52026: 2
2011high 5 (2025) · low 0 (2012)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 22 · See all
  • K102019Restoration Acetabular Wedge AugmentsHowmedica Osteonics · 2011 · cites it directly21descendants
  • K153345Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics · 2016 · 2 generations on17descendants
  • K173499Exeter V40 Femoral Stem Hip System, Orthinox V40 Femoral HeadsStryker Orthopaedics · 2018 · 3 generations on8descendants
  • K182468Trident X3 Acetabular Inserts, ADM and MDM X3 Acetabular Inserts, Accolade II Hip SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. A.K.A. Stryker Orthopaedics · 2019 · 3 generations on7descendants
  • K220731Insignia Hip Stem, Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal StemStryker · 2022 · 3 generations on6descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K971422Osteonics Acetabular Wedge SystemOsteonics Corp.1997—
+1K102019Restoration Acetabular Wedge AugmentsHowmedica Osteonics20111
+2K153345Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics20161
+3K173499Exeter V40 Femoral Stem Hip System, Orthinox V40 Femoral HeadsStryker Orthopaedics20182
+3K182468Trident X3 Acetabular Inserts, ADM and MDM X3 Acetabular Inserts, Accolade II…Howmedica Osteonics Corp. A.K.A. Stryker Orthopaedics2019—
+3K220731Insignia Hip Stem, Restoration Modular 115mm Conical Distal StemStryker2022—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201610
201810
201920
202010
202110
202240
202310
202430
202550
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K971422, 1997–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MEH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MEH device

  1. #1 K210581 Actis DuoFix Hip Prosthesis- Collarlessscore 23.9 · 16 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—MARS (Modular Acetabular Reconstruction System) Device
Named without a submission number
—
*—Osteonics® Secur-Fit™ HA Acetabular Shells
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (22)

See all 22

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102019Restoration Acetabular Wedge AugmentsHowmedica Osteonics201121

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K102019 (Howmedica Osteonics, 2011) has gone furthest, with 21 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MEH devices

MEH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-Porous, Calcium Phosphate: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MEH

5in 2025

2007: 22008: 62009: 62010: 52011: 52012: 62013: 12015: 22016: 62017: 32018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 32022: 32023: 22024: 62025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2008) · low 0 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MEH

87in 2025

2008: 79 days median2009: 65 days median2010: 226 days median2011: 95 days median2012: 131 days median2016: 163 days median2017: 209 days median2020: 131 days median2021: 83 days median2022: 150 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 87 days median
2007high 226 (2010) · low 65 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MEH

1in 2025

2007: 32008: 802009: 512010: 162011: 42012: 32014: 12015: 12016: 42017: 12018: 32020: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 80 (2008) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MEH

470in 2025

2007: 252008: 2612009: 5392010: 4622011: 4192012: 1,6062013: 1,2952014: 1,1962015: 4902016: 3472017: 3832018: 3372019: 3352020: 3382021: 3722022: 3162023: 3342024: 3542025: 470
2007high 1,606 (2012) · low 25 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MEH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—325
200867980261
200966551539
2010522616462
20115954419
2012613131,606
20131—01,295
20140—11,196
20152—1490
201661634347
201732091383
20182—3337
20191—0335
202031311338
20213830372
202231500316
20232—0334
20246910354
20255871470
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The Osteonics® Acetabular Wedges because they are accessory components to an existing total hip replacement system, are subject to the general indications of their mating acetabular shell components, as follows: General Indications for Total Hip Replacement Components Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis. Revision of previous…

Read the full statement (164 words)

The Osteonics® Acetabular Wedges because they are accessory components to an existing total hip replacement system, are subject to the general indications of their mating acetabular shell components, as follows:

General Indications for Total Hip Replacement Components

Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.

Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure.

Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.

Where bone stock is of poor quality or is inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies of the acetabulum.

Indications Specific to the Acetabular Wedges

As an alternative to structural allograft in cases of superior and superior/posterior segmental acetabular deficiencies.

The assembled acetabular wedge-to-shell construct can be affixed to the acetabulum either with or without bone cement, according to the specific fixation methods already determined substantially equivalent by FDA for the commercially available, mating acetabular shell components.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K971422: Osteonics Acetabular Wedge System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K971422

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026