510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2010

Stryker Interpulse Handpiece Set, Splash Shields, Irrigation and Suction Tips, Rechargeable Battery Pack

K972069510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 29, 199756-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5475Recalls 7

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stryker Instruments · FQH Lavage, Jet

Cleared on Jul 29, 1997 after a 56-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 32 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 7 times.

Decided
Jul 29, 1997
Review
56 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FQH
Recalls
7
Predicates
0

32 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 descendant cleared2001: 2 descendants cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2007: 3 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2020: 3 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2025: 3 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK972069 Stryker Interpulse Handpiece Set, Splash Shields, Irrigation and…Stryker Instruments · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 31 of its ownK991383 Hydrocision Debdridement SystemHydrocision, Inc. · 2000
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 19 of its ownK012464 Helix Hydro-JetAndreas Pein Medizintechnik GmbH · 2001
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 17 of its ownK022613 Helix Hydro-JetErbe USA, Inc. · 2002
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 16 of its ownK033590 Erbe Helix Hydro-JetErbe USA, Inc. · 2004
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 14 of its ownK072404 Erbe Erbejet 2 SystemErbe USA, Inc. · 2007

Showing 5 of 32 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2000: 12001: 22002: 12003: 12004: 12006: 12007: 32008: 12009: 22011: 22013: 12014: 12015: 22017: 12019: 12020: 32021: 12022: 12023: 32025: 3
2000high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 32 · See all
  • K991383Hydrocision Debdridement SystemHydrocision, Inc. · 2000 · cites it directly31descendants
  • K012464Helix Hydro-JetAndreas Pein Medizintechnik GmbH · 2001 · 2 generations on19descendants
  • K022613Helix Hydro-JetErbe USA, Inc. · 2002 · 3 generations on17descendants
  • K033590Erbe Helix Hydro-JetErbe USA, Inc. · 2004 · 4 generations on16descendants
  • K072404Erbe Erbejet 2 SystemErbe USA, Inc. · 2007 · 3 generations on14descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K972069Stryker Interpulse Handpiece Set, Splash Shields, Irrigation and Suction Tips…Stryker Instruments1997—
+1K991383Hydrocision Debdridement SystemHydrocision, Inc.2000—
+2K012464Helix Hydro-JetAndreas Pein Medizintechnik GmbH2001—
+3K022613Helix Hydro-JetErbe USA, Inc.2002—
+4K033590Erbe Helix Hydro-JetErbe USA, Inc.2004—
+3K072404Erbe Erbejet 2 SystemErbe USA, Inc.2007—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200120
200210
200310
200410
200610
200730
200810
200920
201120
201310
201410
201520
201710
201910
202030
202110
202210
202330
202530
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K972069, 1997–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FQH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FQH device

  1. #1 K253996 BD Surgiphor™ Antimicrobial Irrigation System…score 14.8 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Davol
Named without a submission number
—
*—Davis+Geck
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (32)

See all 32

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K991383Hydrocision Debdridement SystemHydrocision, Inc.200031

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0950-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0947-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0948-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0949-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0953-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0951-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.
Oct 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-0952-2011Packaging process controlThere is potential for a breach in sterility in the blister packaging. This can lead to the use of non-sterile product which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K991383 (Hydrocision, Inc., 2000) has gone furthest, with 31 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All FQH devices

FQH Lavage, Jet: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FQH

3in 2023

2007: 12009: 32011: 22012: 12015: 12016: 12020: 32021: 12022: 42023: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2022) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FQH

410in 2023

2009: 240 days median2020: 130 days median2022: 136 days median2023: 410 days median
2007high 410 (2023) · low 130 (2020)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FQH

2in 2019

2007: 132009: 12010: 72017: 12019: 2
2007high 13 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FQH

835in 2025

2007: 102008: 272009: 702010: 1352011: 832012: 1332013: 1342014: 1942015: 1162016: 1502017: 2432018: 3172019: 3282020: 3932021: 3982022: 1712023: 3332024: 4252025: 835
2007high 835 (2025) · low 10 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FQH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—1310
20080—027
20093240170
20100—7135
20112—083
20121—0133
20130—0134
20140—0194
20151—0116
20161—0150
20170—1243
20180—0317
20190—2328
202031300393
20211—0398
202241360171
202334100333
20240—0425
20250—0835
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Stryker InterPulse Lavage System is intended for wound debridement, soft tissue debridement, and cleansing of a medical, clinical, or surgical site. This includes cleansing of bone in surgical procedures, hydrodebridement of chronic wounds, debridement of loose skin on burn wounds, and cleansing wounds incurred from trauma.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K972069: Stryker Interpulse Handpiece Set, Splash Shields, Irrigation and Suction Tips, Rechargeable Battery Pack.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K972069

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026