510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Coregistration Function

K972451510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 22, 1998206-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Nomos Corp. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Jan 22, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K960071 (Radionics Software Applications, Inc., 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 206-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1989. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 22, 1998
Review
206 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K884261 (1989). 5 ancestors in all. 5 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor1990: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant clearedK884261 · Prowess 2000 · Small Systems Group, Inc. · 1989K940663 · Peacock Plan · Nomos Corp. · 19961990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant5 generations forward: 1 descendant K940663 · Peacock Plan · Nomos Corp. · 1996K884261 · Prowess 2000 · Small Systems Group, Inc. · 19890+5
  1. Root · 2 generations backK884261 Prowess 2000Small Systems Group, Inc. · 1989
  2. 1 generation backK940663 Peacock PlanNomos Corp. · 1996
  3. This deviceK972451 Coregistration FunctionNomos Corp. · 1998
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK032209 Nomos Corvus 5.0MNomos Corp. · 2003
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK100092 Corvus Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos · 2010
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK151469 CORVUS Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos · 2015
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 1 of its ownK201350 CorvusBest Nomos · 2020
  8. Descendant · 5 generations on · 0 of its ownK211034 Corvus Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos · 2021

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K032209Nomos Corvus 5.0MNomos Corp. · 2003 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K100092Corvus Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos · 2010 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K151469CORVUS Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos · 2015 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K201350CorvusBest Nomos · 2020 · 4 generations on1descendant
  • K211034Corvus Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos · 2021 · 5 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K884261Prowess 2000Small Systems Group, Inc.1989—
−1K940663Peacock PlanNomos Corp.1996—
0 (this device)K972451Coregistration FunctionNomos Corp.1998—
+1K032209Nomos Corvus 5.0MNomos Corp.2003—
+2K100092Corvus Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos2010—
+3K151469CORVUS Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos2015—
+4K201350CorvusBest Nomos2020—
+5K211034Corvus Radiation Therapy Planning SystemBest Nomos2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
199010
199610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
201010
201510
202010
202110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K972451, 1989–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960071Imagefusion
Summary page 1
…ction Applicant Name and Address l;sog(ewse%%%ogaat}i’%ré Road Sewickley, PA 15143 Name of Predicate Devices ImageFusion - Radionics Software Applications (RSA), Inc. (K960071)' Classification CORVUS™ (Cleared as PEACOCK® Plan (K940663) is classified as class II devices according to 21 CFR 882.5050 (90…
Radionics Software Applications, Inc.1996—
*K940663Peacock Plan
Summary page 1
…d Sewickley, PA 15143 Name of Predicate Devices ImageFusion - Radionics Software Applications (RSA), Inc. (K960071)' Classification CORVUS™ (Cleared as PEACOCK® Plan (K940663) is classified as class II devices according to 21 CFR 882.5050 (90 IYE). These devices are reviewed by the Radiological Devices…
Nomos Corp.1996—

Also cleared against K960071: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (5)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K032209Nomos Corvus 5.0MNomos Corp.20034

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.7 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K032209 (Nomos Corp., 2003) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K960071.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—

What is it indicated for?

The Coregistration function is intended for use as part of an RT planning system (such as CORVUS) in procedures which could benefit from the ability to correlate between multiple image sets regardless of the modality used for scanning. In addition this function may be used to coregister earlier patient scans without a localization system.

The Coregistration function enables the use of complementary image data while maintaining the geometric accuracy and tissue density information from the CT.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K972451: Coregistration Function.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K972451

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026