510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ksea Calcuson

K973251510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 22, 1998297-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.4480

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. · FEO Lithotriptor, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Jun 22, 1998 after a 297-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 7 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 22, 1998
Review
297 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FEO
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

7 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2005: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK973251 Ksea CalcusonKARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK052135 Cybersonics Cyberwand Dual Probe LithotripterCybersonics, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK102169 Cyberwand LithotripterCybersonics, Inc. · 2010
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK120303 Cyberwand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy SystemCybersonics, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK142428 Shock Pulse-SE Lithotripsy System CYBERWAND IICybersonics, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK171024 ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy SystemCybersonics, Inc. · 2017 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 7 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2005: 12010: 12012: 22013: 12014: 12017: 1
2005high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2006)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 7 · See all
  • K052135Cybersonics Cyberwand Dual Probe LithotripterCybersonics, Inc. · 2005 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K102169Cyberwand LithotripterCybersonics, Inc. · 2010 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K120303Cyberwand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy SystemCybersonics, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K142428Shock Pulse-SE Lithotripsy System CYBERWAND IICybersonics, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K171024ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy SystemCybersonics, Inc. · 2017 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K973251Ksea CalcusonKARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.1998—
+1K052135Cybersonics Cyberwand Dual Probe LithotripterCybersonics, Inc.20051
+2K102169Cyberwand LithotripterCybersonics, Inc.2010—
+2K120303Cyberwand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy SystemCybersonics, Inc.2012—
+3K142428Shock Pulse-SE Lithotripsy System CYBERWAND IICybersonics, Inc.20141
+4K171024ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy SystemCybersonics, Inc.20176

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
201010
201220
201310
201410
201710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K973251, 1998–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FEO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FEO device

  1. #1 K230893 Swiss LthoClast Trilogyscore 8.3 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (7)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K052135Cybersonics Cyberwand Dual Probe LithotripterCybersonics, Inc.20056

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K052135 (Cybersonics, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 6 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All FEO devices

FEO Lithotriptor, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FEO

1in 2023

2014: 12017: 12018: 42023: 1
2007high 4 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FEO

32in 2018

2018: 32 days median
2007high 32 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FEO

1in 2025

2025: 1
2007high 1 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FEO

354in 2025

2007: 52008: 22009: 22010: 72011: 42012: 122013: 112014: 162015: 62016: 22017: 82018: 92019: 122020: 1282021: 662022: 302023: 392024: 2212025: 354
2007high 354 (2025) · low 2 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FEO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—05
20080—02
20090—02
20100—07
20110—04
20120—012
20130—011
20141—016
20150—06
20160—02
20171—08
201843209
20190—012
20200—0128
20210—066
20220—030
20231—039
20240—0221
20250—1354
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

These instruments are intended for use by qualified surgeons and provide for the fragmentation of renal, ureteral and bladder calculi.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K973251: Ksea Calcuson.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K973251

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026