510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Swift Delivery Product #300

K973942510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 12, 199777-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.4340

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Swift Delivery Products · HDB Extractor, Vacuum, Fetal

Cleared on Dec 12, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K970170 (Richard G. Lindsay, 1997) after a 77-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1989.

Decided
Dec 12, 1997
Review
77 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HDB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K890307 (1989). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK890307 Mityvac M Style Vacuum Extractor, DisposableNeward Enterprises, Inc. · 1989
  2. 1 generation backK970170 Swift Delivery Product #002-Vac EX Cup W/Vac Rel ValveRichard G. Lindsay · 1997
  3. This deviceK973942 Swift Delivery Product #300Swift Delivery Products · 1997
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K890307Mityvac M Style Vacuum Extractor, DisposableNeward Enterprises, Inc.1989—
−1K970170Swift Delivery Product #002-Vac EX Cup W/Vac Rel ValveRichard G. Lindsay1997—
0 (this device)K973942Swift Delivery Product #300Swift Delivery Products1997—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K973942, 1989–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HDB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HDB device

  1. #1 K250298 Kiwi® Complete Vacuum Delivery System…score 10.7 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K970170Swift Delivery Product #002-Vac EX Cup W/Vac Rel Valve
Summary page 1
…n Panel: OB/GYN Product Code: 85HDB C.F.R. Section: CFR - 21 (884.4340) Device Class: Class || Indication Use: Vacuum Extractor Cup used in child birth Equivalence to: ' K970170 Swift Vacuum Extractor with release valve Description of the Device: The new product is an improved vacuum extractor cup. The imp…
Richard G. Lindsay1997—

Also cleared against K970170: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 8.0 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K970170.

How does its category compare?

All HDB devices

HDB Extractor, Vacuum, Fetal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HDB

1in 2025

2025: 1
2007high 1 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HDB

Too few HDB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HDB

3in 2008

2008: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HDB

17in 2025

2007: 252008: 352009: 122010: 132011: 82012: 92013: 72014: 112015: 132016: 152017: 162018: 252019: 312020: 242021: 212022: 122023: 232024: 242025: 17
2007high 35 (2008) · low 7 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HDB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—025
20080—335
20090—012
20100—013
20110—08
20120—09
20130—07
20140—011
20150—013
20160—015
20170—016
20180—025
20190—031
20200—024
20210—021
20220—012
20230—023
20240—024
20251—017
20260—1—

What is it indicated for?

The Indications For Use for this vacuum device in childbirth are the following:

Uterine inertia

Maternal Exhaustion - ineffective voluntary effort

Vertex Presentation

Engagement of the Head

Optional: A. Maternal distress

B. Fetal distress

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K973942: Swift Delivery Product #300.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K973942

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026