510(k) · Cleared
ClearedMicro II Microcurrent Tens
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Apex Medical Corp. · GZJ Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief
Cleared on Jul 29, 1998 after a 282-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
- Decided
- Jul 29, 1998
- Review
- 282 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- GZJ
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in GZJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new GZJ device
- #1 K252767 actiTENS miniscore 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All GZJ devicesGZJ Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · GZJ
1in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · GZJ
207in 2024
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · GZJ
1in 2011
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · GZJ
13in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code GZJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 13 | 223 | 4 | 4 |
| 2008 | 11 | 136 | 1 | 45 |
| 2009 | 16 | 155 | 0 | 17 |
| 2010 | 5 | 232 | 0 | 22 |
| 2011 | 5 | 168 | 1 | 22 |
| 2012 | 12 | 154 | 0 | 20 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 0 | 10 |
| 2014 | 4 | 344 | 0 | 23 |
| 2015 | 3 | 202 | 0 | 18 |
| 2016 | 3 | 163 | 0 | 32 |
| 2017 | 3 | 113 | 0 | 58 |
| 2018 | 2 | — | 0 | 21 |
| 2019 | 3 | 156 | 0 | 7 |
| 2020 | 4 | 183 | 0 | 10 |
| 2021 | 3 | 231 | 0 | 5 |
| 2022 | 4 | 175 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 1 | — | 0 | 39 |
| 2024 | 3 | 207 | 0 | 12 |
| 2025 | 1 | — | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
This device is restricted to sale or use by or on the order of a physician licensed in the state in which he or she is practicing. It is to be used solely for the symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
1. TENS electrodes must be placed in such a position so as to pass electrical current into the carotid gland area.
2. TENS must not be prescribed to patients who are using a demand type cardic pacemaker.
3. TENS electrodes must not be placed so as to pass current transcerebrally through the head.
4. TENS application must not be recommended before pain syndromes are diagnosed, and not before an appropriate etiology has been established.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K973978 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K973978: Micro II Microcurrent Tens.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K973978
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026