510(k) · Cleared
ClearedVet-CO Otc Vacuum Device/Vet-CO Constriction Ring Set
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Vetco, Inc. · LKY Device, External Penile Rigidity
Cleared on Feb 19, 1998 after a 101-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
- Decided
- Feb 19, 1998
- Review
- 101 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LKY
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LKY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All LKY devicesLKY Device, External Penile Rigidity: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LKY
FDA has decided no LKY device since 2007.
Median 510(k) review, days · LKY
Too few LKY 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · LKY
No recall names LKY since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · LKY
2in 2023
MAUDE reports naming product code LKY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The intended use of the device is to assist men who have difficulty in achieving an erection by using the vacuum device and maintaining a satisfactory erection by using the constriction rings.
For men who are able to achieve an erection but not maintain it, the application of a constriction ring at the base of the penis can sufficiently reduce venous leak to maintain the erection. In this instance, they may not be required to use the vacuum device.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K974215 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K974215: Vet-CO Otc Vacuum Device/Vet-CO Constriction Ring Set.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K974215
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026