510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Keratome System

K974243510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 20, 199869-day reviewClass I21 CFR 886.4370

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Insight Technologies Instruments, LLC · HMY Keratome, Battery-Powered

Cleared on Jan 20, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K970377 (Plancon Instruments, 1997) and 1 other predicate after a 69-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994.

Decided
Jan 20, 1998
Review
69 days
Class
Class I
Product code
HMY
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K935342 (1994). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestorK935342 · SCMD Keratome · S.C.M.D. Keratomes of Arizona · 1994K970377 · Plancon Microlamellar Keratome (Single Piece Keratome Head with Accessories) · Plancon Instruments · 1997199019921994199619982000
  1. Root · 2 generations backK935342 SCMD KeratomeS.C.M.D. Keratomes of Arizona · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK970377 Plancon Microlamellar Keratome (Single Piece Keratome Head with…Plancon Instruments · 1997
  3. This deviceK974243 Keratome SystemInsight Technologies Instruments, LLC · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K935342SCMD KeratomeS.C.M.D. Keratomes of Arizona1994—
−1K970377Plancon Microlamellar Keratome (Single Piece Keratome Head with Accessories)Plancon Instruments1997—
0 (this device)K974243Keratome SystemInsight Technologies Instruments, LLC1998—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K974243, 1994–1998Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HMY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K970377Plancon Microlamellar Keratome (Single Piece Keratome Head with Accessories)
Summary page 2
…in design construction, and function to the devices as marketed by: ¢ Plancon Instruments, ANTONY FRANCE 92160 Lamellar Keratoplasty System Model LK.S. Reference 510k: K970377 e S.CM.D. Keratomes of Arizona, FTN. HILLS, AZ 85268 TurboKeratome System by SCMD Model MLK Reference 510k: K935342 Descriptive…
Plancon Instruments1997—
*K935342SCMD Keratome
Summary page 2
…llar Keratoplasty System Model LK.S. Reference 510k: K970377 e S.CM.D. Keratomes of Arizona, FTN. HILLS, AZ 85268 TurboKeratome System by SCMD Model MLK Reference 510k: K935342 Descriptive Comparison: Refer to “Attachment 1” for similarities and differences between the Insight Technologies Instruments L…
S.C.M.D. Keratomes of Arizona1994—

Also cleared against K970377: 6 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 4 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K970377.

How does its category compare?

All HMY devices

HMY Keratome, Battery-Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HMY

FDA has decided no HMY device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · HMY

Too few HMY 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HMY

1in 2007

2007: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HMY

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 22009: 22010: 12013: 12014: 12020: 132021: 72022: 22023: 12024: 22025: 1
2007high 13 (2020) · low 0 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HMY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—11
20080—02
20090—02
20100—01
20110—00
20120—00
20130—01
20140—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—013
20210—07
20220—02
20230—01
20240—02
20250—01
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Insight Technologies Instruments, Model K-1000 Keratome System is designed to produce a corneal flap.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K974243: Keratome System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K974243

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026