510(k) · Cleared
ClearedAbutment - Complete
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
The Implant Center of the Palm Beaches · DZE Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form
Cleared on Feb 20, 1998 after a 107-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
- Decided
- Feb 20, 1998
- Review
- 107 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DZE
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DZE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DZE device
- #1 K211090 ZENEX Implant Systemscore 25.4 · 15 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All DZE devicesDZE Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · DZE
31in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DZE
184in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DZE
1in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DZE
465,788in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DZE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 43 | 107 | 11 | 225 |
| 2008 | 61 | 118 | 4 | 393 |
| 2009 | 41 | 110 | 3 | 164 |
| 2010 | 34 | 162 | 3 | 360 |
| 2011 | 26 | 194 | 0 | 362 |
| 2012 | 39 | 174 | 11 | 358 |
| 2013 | 42 | 195 | 1 | 391 |
| 2014 | 36 | 265 | 7 | 1,124 |
| 2015 | 36 | 215 | 3 | 2,894 |
| 2016 | 40 | 219 | 15 | 1,116 |
| 2017 | 48 | 223 | 4 | 9,719 |
| 2018 | 41 | 200 | 4 | 12,892 |
| 2019 | 31 | 231 | 8 | 167,016 |
| 2020 | 41 | 230 | 0 | 255,524 |
| 2021 | 34 | 182 | 6 | 479,618 |
| 2022 | 34 | 243 | 0 | 483,224 |
| 2023 | 35 | 248 | 0 | 537,585 |
| 2024 | 40 | 222 | 1 | 473,629 |
| 2025 | 31 | 184 | 1 | 465,788 |
| 2026 | 15 | 194 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The abutment submitted is for use in multiple unit, paruaL or full edentulous case types. The underlying surface mates with the external hex of the dental implant, and the set screw down the middle locks it into place. Its purpose is to provide a gentle contonr £ 2l ~mar~ing from the top of the implant into the oral cavity, ending with a metal margin or a cosmetic margin that can be established at the laboratory phase. The laboratory technician with this…
Read the full statement (188 words)
The abutment submitted is for use in multiple unit, paruaL or full edentulous case types. The underlying surface mates with the external hex of the dental implant, and the set screw down the middle locks it into place. Its purpose is to provide a gentle contonr £ 2l ~mar~ing from the top of the implant into the oral cavity, ending with a metal margin or a cosmetic margin that can be established at the laboratory phase. The laboratory technician with this abutment has coping devices to place over the abutment or the abutment analog to fabricate the prosthetic design inthe laboratory, which will then be brought to the patient for these clinical indications. It is not intended for single-tooth application, as there is no built-in, anti-rotational features. It is, therefore, recommended only as a multiple unit; partially edentulous; or a multiple unit, totally edentulous abutment design. It functions similarly to other designs in this implant system for similar indications. The components are made of biocompatible ASTM standard titanium/titanium alloy, and it is not considered an implant, as is an abutment piece placed above the top of the implants.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K974280 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K974280: Abutment - Complete.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K974280
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026