510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Xenon 300MX

K980044510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 3, 199887-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4580

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Perkinelmer Optoelectronics · FSS Light, Surgical, Floor Standing

Cleared on Apr 3, 1998 after an 87-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Apr 3, 1998
Review
87 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FSS
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant clearedReference device: K971057 · Cogenlight Technologies XLS Illuminator System · Cogent Light Technologies, Inc. · 19971995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK980044 Xenon 300MXPerkinelmer Optoelectronics · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK984124 Aesculap Xenon Light SourceAesculap, Inc. · 1999

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K984124Aesculap Xenon Light SourceAesculap, Inc. · 1999 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K980044Xenon 300MXPerkinelmer Optoelectronics1998—
+1K984124Aesculap Xenon Light SourceAesculap, Inc.1999—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K980044, 1998–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FSS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Karl Storz Cold Light Fountain Xenon 300
Named without a submission number
—
*—Maxenon
Named without a submission number
—
*—Brite Lite II
Named without a submission number
—
†K971057Cogenlight Technologies XLS Illuminator SystemCogent Light Technologies, Inc.1997—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K984124Aesculap Xenon Light SourceAesculap, Inc.19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K984124 (Aesculap, Inc., 1999) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All FSS devices

FSS Light, Surgical, Floor Standing: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FSS

1in 2009

2009: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FSS

Too few FSS 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FSS

No recall names FSS since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · FSS

3in 2025

2009: 32010: 32011: 12012: 32013: 112014: 142015: 102016: 22017: 22019: 132020: 92021: 52022: 32023: 152024: 112025: 3
2007high 15 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FSS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20091—03
20100—03
20110—01
20120—03
20130—011
20140—014
20150—010
20160—02
20170—02
20180—00
20190—013
20200—09
20210—05
20220—03
20230—015
20240—011
20250—03
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Xenon 300mx Illuminator is intended for use as a high intensity light to be used with Fiberoptic cables. Applications include endoscopes, surgical headlamps, and other lighted tools that contained Fiberoptic bundles. Illumination from this device is intended to be used for observation of body cavities, hollow organs, and other surgical sites. Specific areas of application include arthroscopy, laproscopy, gynecology, broncoscopy, urology, and vascular endoscopy. The device is also intended for use as a light source for surgical headlights used in various open surgical procedures. These indications are identical to those listed in the Cogent 510(k) number K971057.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K980044: Xenon 300MX.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K980044

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026