510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Instruments for Endoscopic Plastic Surgery (Eps)

K980129510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 5, 1998295-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. · GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery

Cleared on Nov 5, 1998 after a 295-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 11 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 5, 1998
Review
295 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GCJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

11 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK980129 Instruments for Endoscopic Plastic Surgery (Eps)Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 10 of its ownK993655 Micro-France Electrosurgical Instruments, VariousXomed, Inc. · 1999 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK150959 Sutter Bipolar Forceps-CalvianSutter Medizintechnik GmbH · 2015
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK172368 Bipolar Micro-Coagulation ForcepsGunter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2018
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK024304 Microsurgical Bipolar HandpieceNeomedix Corp. · 2003
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK080257 Microfrance Laparoscopic Manual Surgical InstrumentsMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · 2008

Showing 5 of 11 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1999: 12003: 12004: 12008: 12010: 12015: 12018: 12021: 12023: 12024: 12026: 1
1999high 1 (1999) · low 0 (2000)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 11 · See all
  • K993655Micro-France Electrosurgical Instruments, VariousXomed, Inc. · 1999 · cites it directly10descendants
  • K150959Sutter Bipolar Forceps-CalvianSutter Medizintechnik GmbH · 2015 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K172368Bipolar Micro-Coagulation ForcepsGunter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH · 2018 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K024304Microsurgical Bipolar HandpieceNeomedix Corp. · 2003 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K080257Microfrance Laparoscopic Manual Surgical InstrumentsMedtronic Xomed, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K980129Instruments for Endoscopic Plastic Surgery (Eps)Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp.1998—
+1K993655Micro-France Electrosurgical Instruments, VariousXomed, Inc.19992
+2K150959Sutter Bipolar Forceps-CalvianSutter Medizintechnik GmbH2015—
+3K172368Bipolar Micro-Coagulation ForcepsGunter Bissinger Medizintechnik GmbH2018—
+2K024304Microsurgical Bipolar HandpieceNeomedix Corp.2003—
+2K080257Microfrance Laparoscopic Manual Surgical InstrumentsMedtronic Xomed, Inc.2008—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200310
200410
200810
201010
201510
201810
202110
202310
202410
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K980129, 1998–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GCJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GCJ device

  1. #1 K214046 780 nm 1688 4K Camera System, 780 nm L11 LED…score 21.4 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Existing pre-enactment devices sold by Richard Wolf
Named without a submission number
—
*—510(k) devices sold by Karl Storz
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (11)

See all 11

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K993655Micro-France Electrosurgical Instruments, VariousXomed, Inc.199910

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K993655 (Xomed, Inc., 1999) has gone furthest, with 10 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GCJ devices

GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GCJ

21in 2025

2007: 182008: 192009: 212010: 242011: 152012: 172013: 152014: 192015: 262016: 272017: 202018: 212019: 152020: 282021: 182022: 202023: 312024: 292025: 212026 (partial year): 26
2007high 31 (2023) · low 15 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GCJ

108in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 85 days median2010: 122 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 93 days median2014: 90 days median2015: 76 days median2016: 99 days median2017: 77 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 61 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 103 days median2023: 109 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 122 days median
2007high 122 (2010) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GCJ

5in 2025

2007: 122008: 162009: 62010: 302011: 92012: 12013: 7, 1 Class I2014: 22016: 52017: 12018: 12022: 12023: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 30 (2010) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GCJ

5,860in 2025

2007: 1,6392008: 1,3192009: 1,9952010: 2,6572011: 2,1332012: 1,5262013: 1,5652014: 1,7142015: 1,7102016: 2,0802017: 3,4682018: 2,5622019: 2,5782020: 2,6182021: 3,4312022: 3,9452023: 6,0022024: 6,0472025: 5,860
2007high 6,047 (2024) · low 1,319 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GCJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071842121,639
20081973161,319
2009218561,995
201024122302,657
20111511392,133
2012178811,526
201315937 (1)1,565
2014199021,714
2015267601,710
2016279952,080
2017207713,468
2018218812,562
2019156002,578
2020286102,618
20211811603,431
20222010313,945
20233110916,002
2024299006,047
20252110855,860
2026261221—

What is it indicated for?

Endoscopes are designed to visualize anatomy through natural and man-made openings in body cavities. Retraction Sheaths are used to form an artificial working access. The introduction of a telescope permits illumination and observation of the operating site. The rotatable stopcock permits continuous irrigation. The retraction sheaths are used in endoscopic plastic surgery in endo-facelift, eyebrow and forehead lift specialties. The Obturator (mandrin) is…

Read the full statement (327 words)

Endoscopes are designed to visualize anatomy through natural and man-made openings in body cavities.

Retraction Sheaths are used to form an artificial working access. The introduction of a telescope permits illumination and observation of the operating site. The rotatable stopcock permits continuous irrigation. The retraction sheaths are used in endoscopic plastic surgery in endo-facelift, eyebrow and forehead lift specialties.

The Obturator (mandrin) is used in conjunction with the sheath for atraumatic insertion into body cavities.

The Optical Retractors are used to maintain a subcutaneous space during surgical procedures for plastic/cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. They can be combined with an endoscope to visualize the tissue and anatomic structures.

The Optical Holders with optical retractors allow single-handled maintenance of subcutaneous pocket while providing traction. One hand is free for dissection. The optical holder or a guide holds the endoscope in position under the blade of the retractor.

Suction/Irrigation Instruments are used to keep the operating site and the endoscope free of blood and secretion; at the same time it serves as a retractor to hold tissue out of the way. The instrument is used in endoscopic surgery of the nose, nasal sinuses, and in endoscopic plastic surgery.

The Micro Grasping Forceps with HF are used to grasp and to coagulate small blood vessels.

The HF Coagulation Suction Aspirator suctions and coagulates while holding tissue out of the way during the endoscopic operation, e.g. of the larynx in connection with CO, lasers, in mediastinoscopy or in plastic surgery.

The Bipolar Coagulation suction Tube (bipolar aspiration tube) is used for aspiration and coagulation of small lesions.

The Bipolar Coagulation Instrument is designed for used in plastic/cosmetic and reconstructive surgery to coagulate small blood vessels that bleed from blunt dissection of subcutaneous tissue. Smoke caused by cauterization of tissue is evacuated from the operative site when used in conjunction with the suction applicator.

Bipolar electrodes are used to coagulate and to remove or destroy tissue by the use of bipolar HF current.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K980129: Instruments for Endoscopic Plastic Surgery (Eps).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K980129

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026