510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IS-Rubella Igg Test System

K981729510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 28, 1999258-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.3510

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Diamedix Corp. · LFX Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Rubella

Cleared on Jan 28, 1999 after a 258-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.

Decided
Jan 28, 1999
Review
258 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LFX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K981729Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LFX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LFX device

  1. #1 K250588 Access Rubella IgGscore 10.4 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Incstar Rubella IgG "fast" ELISA Kit
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LFX devices

LFX Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Rubella: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LFX

2in 2025

2007: 12008: 32010: 22011: 12012: 12025: 2
2007high 3 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LFX

354in 2008

2008: 354 days median
2007high 354 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LFX

1in 2021

2007: 22008: 22009: 32010: 22011: 12016: 22021: 1
2007high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LFX

12in 2025

2007: 52008: 3672009: 192010: 182011: 892012: 372013: 152014: 132015: 152016: 472017: 102018: 242019: 162020: 212021: 132022: 132023: 72024: 132025: 12
2007high 367 (2008) · low 5 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LFX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—25
200833542367
20090—319
20102—218
20111—189
20121—037
20130—015
20140—013
20150—015
20160—247
20170—010
20180—024
20190—016
20200—021
20210—113
20220—013
20230—07
20240—013
20252—012
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Diamedix Is-Rubella IgG Test Kit is an Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) for the qualitative and quantitative determination of IgG antibodies in human serum to aid in the assessment of the patient's immunological response to infection with rubella and in the determination of the immune status of individuals, including females of child-bearing age. The evaluation of acute and convalescent sera can aid in the diagnosis of recent or current infection with rubella. These reagents can be used either manually or in conjunction with the MAGO® Plus Automated EIA Processor.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K981729: IS-Rubella Igg Test System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K981729

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026