510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCT 100 Electrocardiograph
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Macquarie Medical Systems · DPS Electrocardiograph
Cleared on Jul 28, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K946205 (Schiller America, Inc., 1995) and 1 other predicate after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991.
- Decided
- Jul 28, 1998
- Review
- 90 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DPS
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K904032 (1991). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK904032 Elite II ElectrocardiographBurdick Corp. · 1991
- This deviceK981951 CT 100 ElectrocardiographMacquarie Medical Systems · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K904032 | Elite II Electrocardiograph | Burdick Corp. | 1991 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K981951 | CT 100 Electrocardiograph | Macquarie Medical Systems | 1998 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DPS device
- #1 K212112 Cardiologs Holter Platformscore 18.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K946205 | Cardiovit at-1, P-80Summary page 1…ECG monitor, ECG recorder, and others. Proprietary Name: CT 100 Electrocardiograph D. Classification Number: 74DPS E. Substantial Equivalence: Schiller Cardiovit AT-1 (K946205), Burdick Elite II (K904032), and others. F. Device Description: The device is a battery-operated, portable, 12 lead electrocard… | 1995 |
| * | K904032 | Elite II ElectrocardiographSummary page 1…nd others. Proprietary Name: CT 100 Electrocardiograph D. Classification Number: 74DPS E. Substantial Equivalence: Schiller Cardiovit AT-1 (K946205), Burdick Elite II (K904032), and others. F. Device Description: The device is a battery-operated, portable, 12 lead electrocardiograph which produces a sin… | 1991 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
- 1 other device also cites its predicate K946205.
How does its category compare?
All DPS devicesDPS Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · DPS
6in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DPS
163in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DPS
3in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DPS
55in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 11 | 87 | 2 | 9 |
| 2008 | 13 | 31 | 0 | 17 |
| 2009 | 14 | 84 | 1 | 14 |
| 2010 | 11 | 104 | 2 | 21 |
| 2011 | 22 | 154 | 1 | 121 |
| 2012 | 12 | 117 | 0 | 56 |
| 2013 | 10 | 134 | 0 | 15 |
| 2014 | 11 | 253 | 0 | 15 |
| 2015 | 8 | 178 | 0 | 30 |
| 2016 | 11 | 229 | 0 | 12 |
| 2017 | 9 | 177 | 0 | 15 |
| 2018 | 14 | 221 | 0 | 19 |
| 2019 | 3 | 178 | 9 | 27 |
| 2020 | 6 | 224 | 2 | 59 |
| 2021 | 5 | 135 | 1 | 24 |
| 2022 | 6 | 244 | 1 | 59 |
| 2023 | 10 | 236 | 3 | 54 |
| 2024 | 8 | 260 | 4 (1) | 64 |
| 2025 | 6 | 163 | 3 | 55 |
| 2026 | 6 | 258 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The device is intended for use as a diagmostic device which receives, records, and produces a visual display of the electrical signal produced by the heart.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K981951 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K981951: CT 100 Electrocardiograph.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K981951
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026