510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cryopro Maxi and Cryopro Mini

K982280510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 25, 1998148-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4350

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cortex Technology Aps · GEH Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories

Cleared on Nov 25, 1998 after a 148-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 18 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 25, 1998
Review
148 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

18 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK982280 Cryopro Maxi and Cryopro MiniCortex Technology Aps · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 16 of its ownK040809 Crymed Cryo-AblatorCrymed Technologies, Inc. · 2004
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 15 of its ownK060555 Spraygenix Cryo Ablation SystemCrymed Technologies, Inc. · 2006
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 13 of its ownK070893 Cryospray Ablation System, Model CU 8407020500CSA Medical, Inc. · 2007
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 11 of its ownK101825 Cryoballoon Ablation SystemC2 Therapeutics · 2010
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 10 of its ownK131523 Cryoballoon Focal Ablation SystemC2 Therapeutics · 2013 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 18 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12006: 12007: 22010: 12012: 12013: 12015: 12016: 32017: 12018: 12019: 12020: 22021: 12024: 1
2004high 3 (2016) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 18 · See all
  • K040809Crymed Cryo-AblatorCrymed Technologies, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly16descendants
  • K060555Spraygenix Cryo Ablation SystemCrymed Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly15descendants
  • K070893Cryospray Ablation System, Model CU 8407020500CSA Medical, Inc. · 2007 · 2 generations on13descendants
  • K101825Cryoballoon Ablation SystemC2 Therapeutics · 2010 · 2 generations on11descendants
  • K131523Cryoballoon Focal Ablation SystemC2 Therapeutics · 2013 · 3 generations on10descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K982280Cryopro Maxi and Cryopro MiniCortex Technology Aps1998—
+1K040809Crymed Cryo-AblatorCrymed Technologies, Inc.2004—
+1K060555Spraygenix Cryo Ablation SystemCrymed Technologies, Inc.2006—
+2K070893Cryospray Ablation System, Model CU 8407020500CSA Medical, Inc.2007—
+2K101825Cryoballoon Ablation SystemC2 Therapeutics2010—
+3K131523Cryoballoon Focal Ablation SystemC2 Therapeutics20132

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200610
200720
201010
201210
201310
201510
201630
201710
201810
201910
202020
202110
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982280, 1998–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEH device

  1. #1 K211099 Freeze’n Clear Skin Clinic Warts & Tagsscore 25.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—CryoGun® liquid nitrogen cryosurgical system
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (18)

See all 18

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K040809Crymed Cryo-AblatorCrymed Technologies, Inc.200416
K060555Spraygenix Cryo Ablation SystemCrymed Technologies, Inc.200615
K193619Cry-Ac®, Cry-Ac-3®, Cry-BabyBrymill Cryogenic Systems20200

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K040809 (Crymed Technologies, Inc., 2004) has gone furthest, with 16 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEH devices

GEH Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEH

10in 2025

2007: 62008: 12009: 42010: 42011: 72012: 42013: 42014: 62015: 112016: 152017: 122018: 62019: 62020: 82021: 62022: 62023: 82024: 92025: 102026 (partial year): 8
2007high 15 (2016) · low 1 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEH

77in 2025

2007: 71 days median2009: 121 days median2010: 86 days median2011: 91 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 76 days median2014: 42 days median2015: 72 days median2016: 60 days median2017: 83 days median2018: 42 days median2019: 115 days median2020: 113 days median2021: 206 days median2022: 56 days median2023: 136 days median2024: 85 days median2025: 77 days median2026 (partial year): 148 days median
2007high 206 (2021) · low 42 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEH

2in 2023

2007: 32008: 22009: 132010: 42012: 32014: 22018: 12019: 12020: 372023: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 37 (2020) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEH

171in 2025

2007: 232008: 292009: 212010: 1732011: 612012: 912013: 912014: 572015: 972016: 1432017: 2162018: 2082019: 4552020: 2772021: 2132022: 2302023: 1642024: 1412025: 171
2007high 455 (2019) · low 21 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007671323
20081—229
200941211321
20104864173
2011791061
2012496391
2013476091
2014642257
20151172097
201615600143
201712830216
20186421208
201961151455
2020811337277
202162060213
20226560230
202381362164
20249850141
202510770171
202681482—

What is it indicated for?

The CryoPro® Mini and CryoPro® Maxi units are intended to be used within the fields of dermatology and plastic surgery for the treatment of cryoresponsive benign, premalignant and malignant tumors such as skin tags, verrucae, actinic keratoses and basal cell carcinoma.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982280: Cryopro Maxi and Cryopro Mini.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982280

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026