510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Opc Lowwear Porcelain

K982377510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 18, 199841-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.6660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Jeneric/Pentron, Inc. · EIH Powder, Porcelain

Cleared on Aug 18, 1998 after a 41-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Aug 18, 1998
Review
41 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EIH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK982377 Opc Lowwear PorcelainJeneric/Pentron, Inc. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK993249 Opc Low Wear Opaque PorcelainJeneric/Pentron, Inc. · 1999

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K993249Opc Low Wear Opaque PorcelainJeneric/Pentron, Inc. · 1999 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K982377Opc Lowwear PorcelainJeneric/Pentron, Inc.1998—
+1K993249Opc Low Wear Opaque PorcelainJeneric/Pentron, Inc.1999—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982377, 1998–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EIH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EIH device

  1. #1 K192231 Dental Glass Ceramics Blocksscore 15.2 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K993249Opc Low Wear Opaque PorcelainJeneric/Pentron, Inc.19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K993249 (Jeneric/Pentron, Inc., 1999) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EIH devices

EIH Powder, Porcelain: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EIH

13in 2025

2007: 152008: 152009: 152010: 142011: 142012: 92013: 162014: 182015: 232016: 222017: 162018: 102019: 162020: 132021: 172022: 162023: 152024: 282025: 132026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2024) · low 9 (2012)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EIH

84in 2025

2007: 63 days median2008: 87 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 89 days median2011: 80 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 107 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 118 days median2016: 187 days median2017: 149 days median2018: 139 days median2019: 125 days median2020: 155 days median2021: 131 days median2022: 89 days median2023: 114 days median2024: 89 days median2025: 84 days median2026 (partial year): 73 days median
2007high 187 (2016) · low 63 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EIH

1in 2025

2016: 212025: 1
2007high 21 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EIH

1in 2025

2008: 12011: 12013: 62014: 12016: 42017: 12018: 22019: 12021: 222024: 72025: 1
2007high 22 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EIH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007156300
2008158701
2009157900
2010148900
2011148001
201299600
20131610706
20141811801
20152311800
201622187214
20171614901
20181013902
20191612501
20201315500
202117131022
2022168900
20231511400
2024288907
2025138411
202614730—

What is it indicated for?

OPC LowWear™ Porcelain (enamel and incisal for mixing) is to be used in conjunction with Optimal Pressable Ceramic (OPC) pellets for all-ceramic fixed prosthodontics, inckluding full crowns, veneers and inlays/onlays. These translucent porcelains are applied in thin layers over the OPC pellet pressed ceramic cores. The average crystal size of the leucite within the LowWear Porcelain glassy matrix is 2-3 pm, with a crystal size range between 1-4 ym. The…

Read the full statement (107 words)

OPC LowWear™ Porcelain (enamel and incisal for mixing) is to be used in conjunction with Optimal Pressable Ceramic (OPC) pellets for all-ceramic fixed prosthodontics, inckluding full crowns, veneers and inlays/onlays. These translucent porcelains are applied in thin layers over the OPC pellet pressed ceramic cores. The average crystal size of the leucite within the LowWear Porcelain glassy matrix is 2-3 pm, with a crystal size range between 1-4 ym. The smaller leucite crystals vs. conventional porcelains and other all-ceramic porcelains (average 8 um, range 1-40 pm) resuits in less abrasion against opposing dentition, as supported by independent testing from Dr. Shiro Suzuki, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982377: Opc Lowwear Porcelain.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982377

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026