510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Surgi Stim

K982388510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 14, 199867-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5850

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vision Quest Industries, Inc. · IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered

Cleared on Sep 14, 1998 after a 67-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 4 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 14, 1998
Review
67 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IPF
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

4 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2020: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK982388 Surgi StimVision Quest Industries, Inc. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK030507 T.E.a.R. TECH3 Model #44TT03Vision Quest Industries, Inc. · 2003
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK090532 T.E.a.R. TECH3Vision Quest Industries, Inc. · 2009
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK183692 Avid IF2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare · 2019
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK202490 Avid CT2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare · 2020

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K030507T.E.a.R. TECH3 Model #44TT03Vision Quest Industries, Inc. · 2003 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K090532T.E.a.R. TECH3Vision Quest Industries, Inc. · 2009 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K183692Avid IF2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare · 2019 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K202490Avid CT2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare · 2020 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K982388Surgi StimVision Quest Industries, Inc.1998—
+1K030507T.E.a.R. TECH3 Model #44TT03Vision Quest Industries, Inc.2003—
+2K090532T.E.a.R. TECH3Vision Quest Industries, Inc.2009—
+2K183692Avid IF2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare2019—
+1K202490Avid CT2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare2020—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200910
201910
202010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982388, 1998–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IPF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IPF device

  1. #1 K241433 EVE Synergy (EVE-20M)score 19.7 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (4)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K030507T.E.a.R. TECH3 Model #44TT03Vision Quest Industries, Inc.20033
K202490Avid CT2Vision Quest Industries Inc./Dba VQ Orthocare20200

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K030507 (Vision Quest Industries, Inc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IPF devices

IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IPF

3in 2025

2007: 82008: 62009: 72010: 42011: 42012: 42013: 102014: 42015: 32016: 72017: 52018: 52019: 42020: 92021: 152022: 72023: 92024: 72025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 15 (2021) · low 3 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IPF

257in 2025

2007: 143 days median2008: 140 days median2009: 216 days median2010: 121 days median2011: 275 days median2012: 269 days median2013: 180 days median2014: 264 days median2015: 43 days median2016: 113 days median2017: 110 days median2018: 73 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 121 days median2021: 98 days median2022: 108 days median2023: 255 days median2024: 201 days median2025: 257 days median2026 (partial year): 206 days median
2007high 275 (2011) · low 43 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IPF

1in 2023

2008: 12011: 12012: 32023: 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IPF

8in 2025

2007: 112008: 2132009: 1502010: 142011: 252012: 162013: 62014: 192015: 112016: 82017: 22018: 32019: 102020: 132021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 52025: 8
2007high 213 (2008) · low 2 (2017)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IPF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078143011
200861401213
200972160150
20104121014
20114275125
20124269316
20131018006
20144264019
2015343011
2016711308
2017511002
201857303
20194133010
20209121013
2021159803
2022710804
2023925518
2024720105
2025325708
202632060—

What is it indicated for?

This device is a ‘combination’ device and has the same indications for use as two different types of predicate devices. High Volt Pulsed Galvanic Stimulators and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulators share the same indications for use as listed below. Relaxation of muscle spasms Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy Increasing local blood circulation Muscle re-education Maintaining or increasing range of motion Immediate postsurgical stimulation of…

Read the full statement (99 words)

This device is a ‘combination’ device and has the same indications for use as two different types of predicate devices.

High Volt Pulsed Galvanic Stimulators and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulators share the same indications for use as listed below.

Relaxation of muscle spasms

Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy

Increasing local blood circulation

Muscle re-education

Maintaining or increasing range of motion

Immediate postsurgical stimulation of calf muscles to prevent venous thrombosis

Interferential Stimulators have one additional indication for use:

Symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain and as an adjunctive treatment in the management of post traumatic and post-surgical pain relief.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982388: Surgi Stim.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982388

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026