510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ailee Sutures and Ailee Needles

K982646510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 2, 1999308-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4830

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Myco Medical Supplies, Inc. · GAL Suture, Absorbable, Natural

Cleared on Jun 2, 1999 after a 308-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 2, 1999
Review
308 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GAL
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

5 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2017: 1 descendant cleared2024: 2 descendants cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK982646 Ailee Sutures and Ailee NeedlesMyco Medical Supplies, Inc. · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK161633 Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd. · 2017
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK180701 SafePath Suturing SystemSafepath Medical, Inc. · 2018
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK222944 SafePath Sulturing System-Silk Suture, SafePath Sulturing System…Safepath Medical, Inc. · 2024
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK232355 Non absorbable Surgical Silk SutureShandong Haidike Medical Product Co., Ltd. · 2024
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK212888 Golnit Nylon Monofilament SutureAntarma, LLC Dba Golnit Sutures · 2022

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K161633Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd. · 2017 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K180701SafePath Suturing SystemSafepath Medical, Inc. · 2018 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K222944SafePath Sulturing System-Silk Suture, SafePath Sulturing System Polyamide Suture…Safepath Medical, Inc. · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K232355Non absorbable Surgical Silk SutureShandong Haidike Medical Product Co., Ltd. · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K212888Golnit Nylon Monofilament SutureAntarma, LLC Dba Golnit Sutures · 2022 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K982646Ailee Sutures and Ailee NeedlesMyco Medical Supplies, Inc.1999—
+1K161633Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd.2017—
+2K180701SafePath Suturing SystemSafepath Medical, Inc.2018—
+2K222944SafePath Sulturing System-Silk Suture, SafePath Sulturing System Polyamide…Safepath Medical, Inc.2024—
+2K232355Non absorbable Surgical Silk SutureShandong Haidike Medical Product Co., Ltd.2024—
+2K212888Golnit Nylon Monofilament SutureAntarma, LLC Dba Golnit Sutures2022—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201710
201810
202210
202420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982646, 1999–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GAL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (5)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K161633Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd.20174

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K161633 (Sm Eng Co., Ltd., 2017) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GAL devices

GAL Suture, Absorbable, Natural: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GAL

1in 2015

2008: 12015: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GAL

Too few GAL 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · GAL

1in 2019

2019: 1
2007high 1 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GAL

117in 2025

2007: 132008: 62009: 252010: 572011: 362012: 272013: 322014: 1572015: 1372016: 872017: 1332018: 2462019: 2292020: 1092021: 1202022: 1302023: 1212024: 1612025: 117
2007high 246 (2018) · low 6 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GAL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—013
20081—06
20090—025
20100—057
20110—036
20120—027
20130—032
20140—0157
20151—0137
20160—087
20170—0133
20180—0246
20190—1229
20200—0109
20210—0120
20220—0130
20230—0121
20240—0161
20250—0117
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Chromic Gut surgical sutures are indicated for use as absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but NOT for use in cardiovascular and neural tissue. Catgut plain surgical sutures are indicated for use as absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but NOT for use in cardiovascular and neural tissue. Polyglycolic acid…

Read the full statement (187 words)

Chromic Gut surgical sutures are indicated for use as absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but NOT for use in cardiovascular and neural tissue.

Catgut plain surgical sutures are indicated for use as absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but NOT for use in cardiovascular and neural tissue.

Polyglycolic acid sutures are indicated for use as absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but NOT for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues.

Silk sutures are indicated for use as non-absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic, neural tissue.

Polyester sutures are indicated for use as non-absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic, neural tissue.

Nylon sutures are indicated for use as non-absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic, neural tissue.

Polyproylene sutures are indicated for use as non-absorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic, neural tissue.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982646: Ailee Sutures and Ailee Needles.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982646

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026