510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2010

Micromedics Nasal Septal Button

K982667510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 24, 1998116-day reviewClass URecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Micromedics, Inc. · LFB Button, Nasal Septal

Cleared on Nov 24, 1998 after a 116-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Nov 24, 1998
Review
116 days
Class
Class U
Product code
LFB
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982667Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LFB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 15, 2010Not classifiedZ-0347-2011Packaging process controlMicromedics, Inc is conducting a product recall on a number of medical device products because of weak seals of the sterile pouches, potentially resulting in a non-sterile product which may cause transmission of disease or infection.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LFB devices

LFB Button, Nasal Septal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LFB

1in 2013

2013: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LFB

Too few LFB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LFB

1in 2010

2010: 1
2007high 1 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LFB

1in 2021

2017: 12019: 22021: 1
2007high 2 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LFB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—10
20110—00
20120—00
20131—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20180—00
20190—02
20200—00
20210—01
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Non-surgical closure of nasal septum perforation.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982667: Micromedics Nasal Septal Button.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982667

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026