510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Silk Suture

K982853510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 30, 1999260-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.5030

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Davis & Geck, Inc. · GAP Suture, Nonabsorbable, Silk

Cleared on Apr 30, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K930590 (Davis & Geck, Inc., 1993) after a 260-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1993. 16 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 30, 1999
Review
260 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GAP
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K930590 (1993). 16 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2024: 2 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants clearedK930590 · Silk Sutures · Davis & Geck, Inc. · 19931990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 9 descendants3 generations forward: 3 descendants4 generations forward: 3 descendants K930590 · Silk Sutures · Davis & Geck, Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 1 generation backK930590 Silk SuturesDavis & Geck, Inc. · 1993
  2. This deviceK982853 Silk SutureDavis & Geck, Inc. · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 15 of its ownK100006 HS Fiber (Polyblend), River Bond, Riversilk (Silk), Riverpro…Riverpoint Medical · 2010 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 7 of its ownK153307 HS SutureTapeRiverpoint Medical · 2016
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK190817 HS FiberRiverpoint Medical · 2019
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK231163 HS Fiber SuturesRiverpoint Medical · 2024
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK253910 Stitch - Suture Wires and TapesGM Dos Reis Industria e Comercio Ltda. · 2026

Showing 5 of 16 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 12015: 32016: 12018: 12019: 12020: 22021: 12024: 22025: 22026: 2
2010high 3 (2015) · low 0 (2011)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 16 · See all
  • K100006HS Fiber (Polyblend), River Bond, Riversilk (Silk), Riverpro (Polypropylene), Riverlon…Riverpoint Medical · 2010 · cites it directly15descendants
  • K153307HS SutureTapeRiverpoint Medical · 2016 · 2 generations on7descendants
  • K190817HS FiberRiverpoint Medical · 2019 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K231163HS Fiber SuturesRiverpoint Medical · 2024 · 3 generations on3descendants
  • K253910Stitch - Suture Wires and TapesGM Dos Reis Industria e Comercio Ltda. · 2026 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K930590Silk SuturesDavis & Geck, Inc.1993—
0 (this device)K982853Silk SutureDavis & Geck, Inc.1999—
+1K100006HS Fiber (Polyblend), River Bond, Riversilk (Silk), Riverpro (Polypropylene)…Riverpoint Medical20102
+2K153307HS SutureTapeRiverpoint Medical2016—
+2K190817HS FiberRiverpoint Medical2019—
+3K231163HS Fiber SuturesRiverpoint Medical2024—
+4K253910Stitch - Suture Wires and TapesGM Dos Reis Industria e Comercio Ltda.2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201530
201610
201810
201910
202020
202110
202420
202520
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982853, 1993–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GAP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GAP device

  1. #1 K222944 SafePath Sulturing System-Silk Suture…score 9.7 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K930590Silk Sutures
Summary page 2
…he proposed Silk Surgical Suture (w/adhesive) to be substantially equivalent in design, composition and intended use, to the currently marketed Silk Suture covered under K930590. LUV s s, < ,./@ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service LLEY] P "n.’b ¢/ Food and Drug A…
Davis & Geck, Inc.1993—

Also cleared against K930590: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (16)

See all 16

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K100006HS Fiber (Polyblend), River Bond, Riversilk (Silk), Riverpro (Polypropylene), Riverlon…Riverpoint Medical201015

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K100006 (Riverpoint Medical, 2010) has gone furthest, with 15 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K930590.

How does its category compare?

All GAP devices

GAP Suture, Nonabsorbable, Silk: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GAP

3in 2024

2007: 12008: 12016: 22017: 12018: 12023: 12024: 3
2007high 3 (2024) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GAP

193in 2024

2024: 193 days median
2007high 193 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GAP

1in 2023

2011: 212014: 12018: 12023: 1
2007high 21 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GAP

478in 2025

2007: 72008: 212009: 122010: 242011: 62012: 82013: 32014: 152015: 252016: 542017: 552018: 3402019: 3332020: 4262021: 4372022: 4192023: 4042024: 4552025: 478
2007high 478 (2025) · low 3 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GAP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—07
20081—021
20090—012
20100—024
20110—216
20120—08
20130—03
20140—115
20150—025
20162—054
20171—055
20181—1340
20190—0333
20200—0426
20210—0437
20220—0419
20231—1404
202431930455
20250—0478
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Silk sutures are indicated for use as nonabsorbable sutures in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic, and neural tissue.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982853: Silk Suture.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982853

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026