510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2009

Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various Styles

K982953510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 21, 199858-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3020Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet, Inc. · HSB Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories

Cleared on Oct 21, 1998 after a 58-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 121 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Oct 21, 1998
Review
58 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HSB
Recalls
4
Predicates
0

121 later devices descend from it, 12 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2002: 5 descendants cleared2007: 3 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2015: 7 descendants cleared2001: 1 descendant cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared1999: 1 descendant cleared2013: 6 descendants cleared2020: 6 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2009: 4 descendants cleared2008: 3 descendants cleared2012: 7 descendants cleared2011: 3 descendants cleared2017: 8 descendants cleared2026: 14 descendants cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2024: 5 descendants cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2025: 11 descendants cleared2018: 6 descendants cleared2019: 7 descendants cleared2022: 5 descendants cleared2023: 4 descendants cleared2021: 5 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK982953 Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various StylesBiomet, Inc. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 41 of its ownK023115 Ace VersanailDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 37 of its ownK063570 Biomet Tibial Locking Nail SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2007 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 27 of its ownK021786 Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 25 of its ownK101934 Dynnail, 12MM, Locking Screw, 4.6 MM, Deployment Frame, Dynnail…Medshape Solutions · 2011
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 24 of its ownK113828 Dynanail Ankle Arthrodesis NailMedShape, Inc. · 2012

Showing 5 of 121 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1999: 12001: 12002: 52003: 22004: 12005: 12007: 32008: 32009: 42011: 32012: 72013: 62014: 22015: 72016: 42017: 82018: 62019: 72020: 62021: 52022: 52023: 42024: 52025: 112026: 14
1999high 14 (2026) · low 0 (2000)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 121 · See all
  • K023115Ace VersanailDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly41descendants
  • K063570Biomet Tibial Locking Nail SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2007 · cites it directly37descendants
  • K021786Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly27descendants
  • K101934Dynnail, 12MM, Locking Screw, 4.6 MM, Deployment Frame, Dynnail, Models 1200-01-1222…Medshape Solutions · 2011 · 2 generations on25descendants
  • K113828Dynanail Ankle Arthrodesis NailMedShape, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on24descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K982953Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various StylesBiomet, Inc.1998—
+1K023115Ace VersanailDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2002—
+1K063570Biomet Tibial Locking Nail SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp20073
+1K021786Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc.20021
+2K101934Dynnail, 12MM, Locking Screw, 4.6 MM, Deployment Frame, Dynnail, Models…Medshape Solutions2011—
+2K113828Dynanail Ankle Arthrodesis NailMedShape, Inc.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200110
200250
200320
200410
200510
200730
200830
200940
201130
201270
201360
201420
201570
201640
201780
201860
201970
202060
202150
202250
202340
202450
2025110
2026140
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982953, 1998–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HSB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HSB device

  1. #1 K200869 Gamma3 Systemscore 19.8 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Stainless steel intramedullary rods
Named without a submission number
—
*—Grosse Kempf System (Howmedica)
Named without a submission number
—
*—Intramedullary Nails (Zimmer)
Named without a submission number
—
*—Kirschner Intramedullary Nail System (now Biomet, Inc.)
Named without a submission number
—
*—OEC Kuntscher Cloverleaf Nail Systems (now Biomet, Inc.)
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (121)

See all 121

12 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K023115Ace VersanailDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.200241
K063570Biomet Tibial Locking Nail SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp200737
K021786Titanium Ankle Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc.200227
K031438Acumed Small Bone Locking Rod System IIAcumed, LLC200324
K072161Biomet Femoral Locking Nail SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp200722
K993956Titanium Pediatric Femoral NailBiomet, Inc.199914
K012190Aos Modular Femoral NailAdvanced Orthopaedic Solutions, Inc.200110
K013923Titanium Retrograde Femoral Nail - 13 MM DiameterBiomet Orthopedics, Inc.20021
K151456Small Bone Nail ImplantVilex IN Tennessee, Inc.20150
K042409Modular Arthrodesis NailBiomet, Inc.20040

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Apr 2, 2009Not classifiedZ-2289-2009Nonconforming Material/ComponentSome devices could have been made with raw material lots that may have inclusions, and could result in decreased strength of the device.
Apr 2, 2009Not classifiedZ-2288-2009Nonconforming Material/ComponentSome devices could have been made with raw material lots that may have inclusions, and could result in decreased strength of the device.
Mar 27, 2009Not classifiedZ-2116-2009Nonconforming Material/ComponentCertain lots of raw material contain inclusions that could potentially reduce the strength of some devices.
Mar 16, 2005Not classifiedZ-0918-05OtherThe wire appears to be soft and the wire bent during insertion. This causes kinks in which the reamer could not pass over the bent/kinked wire.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K023115 (DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., 2002) has gone furthest, with 41 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HSB devices

HSB Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HSB

15in 2025

2007: 82008: 112009: 182010: 142011: 162012: 172013: 182014: 192015: 222016: 82017: 232018: 172019: 132020: 172021: 102022: 122023: 112024: 132025: 152026 (partial year): 18
2007high 23 (2017) · low 8 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HSB

106in 2025

2007: 68 days median2008: 57 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 117 days median2011: 78 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 119 days median2018: 134 days median2019: 132 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 94 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 162 days median2024: 195 days median2025: 106 days median2026 (partial year): 151 days median
2007high 195 (2024) · low 57 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HSB

18in 2025

2008: 92009: 812010: 182011: 22012: 72013: 142014: 32015: 32016: 62017: 662018: 562019: 62020: 62021: 22022: 12023: 12024: 12025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 81 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HSB

2,911in 2025

2007: 1622008: 1842009: 3342010: 4542011: 6622012: 1,0792013: 1,7732014: 1,4742015: 1,6712016: 1,9202017: 1,4472018: 3,5262019: 2,5172020: 3,2992021: 4,1112022: 2,7332023: 2,2192024: 2,8692025: 2,911
2007high 4,111 (2021) · low 162 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HSB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078680162
200811579184
2009188681334
20101411718454
201116782662
20121711271,079
201318105141,773
20141914731,474
20152211131,671
2016812461,920
201723119661,447
201817134563,526
20191313262,517
20201711263,299
2021109424,111
20221217212,733
20231116212,219
20241319512,869
202515106182,911
2026181511—

What is it indicated for?

Intramedullary rods made of titanium alloy are used for the same indications as stainless steel intramedullary rods that have been commercially available continually since the 1950s. These devices are to be implanted into the long bones for alignment, stabilization and fixation of fractures caused by trauma or disease, the fixation of long bones that have been surgically prepared (osteotomy) for correction of deformity, and for arthrodesis. Intramedullary rods are used in the femur, tibia, fibula, humerus, radius, and ulna.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982953: Titanium Intramedullary Nails-Various Styles.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982953

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026