510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Custom Flanged Acetabular Component

K983035510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 23, 199884-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet, Inc. · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Nov 23, 1998 after an 84-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 219 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 23, 1998
Review
84 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

219 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 6 descendants cleared2000: 1 descendant cleared2022: 15 descendants cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2001: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2013: 13 descendants cleared2023: 17 descendants cleared2011: 12 descendants cleared2020: 9 descendants cleared2024: 11 descendants cleared2015: 6 descendants cleared2018: 9 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2012: 16 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2019: 6 descendants cleared2008: 6 descendants cleared2006: 5 descendants cleared2017: 12 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2009: 5 descendants cleared2025: 19 descendants cleared2021: 17 descendants cleared2026: 17 descendants cleared2014: 6 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK983035 Custom Flanged Acetabular ComponentBiomet, Inc. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 213 of its ownK001277 Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 207 of its ownK031495 Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2003
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 198 of its ownK042344 Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 90 of its ownK060918 Excia Total Hip System 12/14 Trunnion with Ceramic HeadAesculap, Inc. · 2006
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 90 of its ownK060437 Excia Total Hip System with U-CapAesculap, Inc. · 2006

Showing 5 of 219 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2000: 12001: 12003: 22004: 12005: 12006: 52007: 12008: 62009: 52010: 62011: 122012: 162013: 132014: 62015: 62016: 52017: 122018: 92019: 62020: 92021: 172022: 152023: 172024: 112025: 192026: 17
2000high 19 (2025) · low 0 (2002)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 219 · See all
  • K001277Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000 · cites it directly213descendants
  • K031495Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on207descendants
  • K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · 3 generations on198descendants
  • K060918Excia Total Hip System 12/14 Trunnion with Ceramic HeadAesculap, Inc. · 2006 · 4 generations on90descendants
  • K060437Excia Total Hip System with U-CapAesculap, Inc. · 2006 · 4 generations on90descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K983035Custom Flanged Acetabular ComponentBiomet, Inc.1998—
+1K001277Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2000—
+2K031495Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2003—
+3K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc.200510
+4K060918Excia Total Hip System 12/14 Trunnion with Ceramic HeadAesculap, Inc.2006—
+4K060437Excia Total Hip System with U-CapAesculap, Inc.2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200110
200320
200410
200510
200650
200710
200860
200950
201060
2011120
2012160
2013130
201460
201560
201650
2017120
201890
201960
202090
2021170
2022150
2023170
2024110
2025190
2026170
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983035, 1998–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Healey™ Revision Acetabular Component
Named without a submission number
—
*—Recovery Protusio Cage
Named without a submission number
—
*—Universal® Acetabular Component
Named without a submission number
—
*—Mallory-Head® Acetabular Component
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (219)

See all 219

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K001277Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2000213
K030861HA Pmi Flanged Acetabular ComponentBiomet, Inc.20032
K212815My3D® Personalized Pelvic ReconstructionOnkos Surgical20221
K092098Patient Specific Acetabular Reconstruction ProsthesisSmith & Nephew, Inc.20101

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K001277 (DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., 2000) has gone furthest, with 213 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

The Patient Matched Flanged Acetabular Component is indicated for use in patients requiring reconstruction of the hip joint due to disease, deformity or trauma. The device is intended for either cemented or cementless application for general use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing surgery for rehabilitating hip joints. The device is a single use implant. The device is to be used in conjunction with Biomet's RingLoc® Acetabular Liners. The device may be used in conjunction with any commercially available femoral component.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983035: Custom Flanged Acetabular Component.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983035

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026