510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Amielle

K983045510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 25, 199885-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.3900

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Owen Mumford USA, Inc. · KXP Stent, Vaginal

Cleared on Nov 25, 1998 after an 85-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 25, 1998
Review
85 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KXP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2023: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK983045 AmielleOwen Mumford USA, Inc. · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK222492 Hope&Her Vaginal DilatorsLujena, Inc. · 2023

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K222492Hope&Her Vaginal DilatorsLujena, Inc. · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K983045AmielleOwen Mumford USA, Inc.1998—
+1K222492Hope&Her Vaginal DilatorsLujena, Inc.2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983045, 1998–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KXP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Young's Vaginal Dilator
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K222492Hope&Her Vaginal DilatorsLujena, Inc.20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K222492 (Lujena, Inc., 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KXP devices

KXP Stent, Vaginal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KXP

1in 2020

2020: 1
2007high 1 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KXP

Too few KXP 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · KXP

No recall names KXP since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KXP

1in 2008

2008: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KXP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20201—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The device is intended to trcat women suffering from vaginismus and dysparcunia. VAGINISMUS is the involuntary spasm of the muscles in the vaginal wall which then inhibits sexual intercourse by making it painful or impossible. DYSPAREUNIA is the pain experienced during sexual intercourse caused by physical and/oy emotional problems.

The device comes in varying sizes, the most appropriate is then sclected by the physician for use by the paticnt and the patient’s partner as an assistant if appropriate. It is used as a tool to DILATE the vagina in controlled stages.

The device can be autoclaved or sterilised by normal methods.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983045: Amielle.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983045

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026