510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Xray Vision

K983111510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 16, 199873-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Apteryx, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Nov 16, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K955237 (Tau Corp., 1996) after a 73-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1993. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 16, 1998
Review
73 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K930527 (1993). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 descendant clearedK930527 · Dental Link · Escan, Inc. · 1993K955237 · Tigerscan/Tigerview · Tau Corp. · 19961990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K955237 · Tigerscan/Tigerview · Tau Corp. · 1996K930527 · Dental Link · Escan, Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 2 generations backK930527 Dental LinkEscan, Inc. · 1993
  2. 1 generation backK955237 Tigerscan/TigerviewTau Corp. · 1996
  3. This deviceK983111 Xray VisionApteryx, Inc. · 1998
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK072665 Suniray 5.2Orangedental GmbH & Co. KG · 2007

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K072665Suniray 5.2Orangedental GmbH & Co. KG · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K930527Dental LinkEscan, Inc.1993—
−1K955237Tigerscan/TigerviewTau Corp.1996—
0 (this device)K983111Xray VisionApteryx, Inc.1998—
+1K072665Suniray 5.2Orangedental GmbH & Co. KG2007—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983111, 1993–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K955237Tigerscan/Tigerview
Summary page 1
…n, OH 44320 (330) 867-6077 Contact Person: Kevin Crucs Date Prepared: September 2, 1998 Device Name: XrayVision Equivalent Device: TigerView, FDA registration number 955237 Xraszszon is a software package designed to work with standard PC compatible computers capable of running Windows 95 or higher (…
Tau Corp.1996—

Also cleared against K955237: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K072665Suniray 5.2Orangedental GmbH & Co. KG20070

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 5 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K072665 (Orangedental GmbH & Co. KG, 2007) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K955237.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

Uses for XrayVision in the dental industry are as follows: Permits sending of data by email, client/server, ftp, phone and floppy disk Organize and archive x-rays and patient related files Facilitate sharing and transmission of information between doctors, other applications and other computers Ability to place markers and annotations on x-rays for diagnostic purposes Allows user to take calibrated measurements Provide image-processing tools such as…

Read the full statement (149 words)

Uses for XrayVision in the dental industry are as follows:

Permits sending of data by email, client/server, ftp, phone and floppy disk

Organize and archive x-rays and patient related files

Facilitate sharing and transmission of information between doctors, other applications and other computers

Ability to place markers and annotations on x-rays for diagnostic purposes

Allows user to take calibrated measurements

Provide image-processing tools such as sharpening, colorizing, resizing, etc. (none of which physically alter images).

Electronic transmission of images to insurance companies or specialist

When using XrayVision for diagnostic purposes the general public will be the doctor/dentist population. This software is primarily used to store a patient’s imaging data (i.e. x-rays) in a form compatible with today’s networked online practice management software. This software may also be used to transmit radiographs to specialists who will be treating the patient or the insurance company for approval of procedure and etc.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983111: Xray Vision.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983111

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026