510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCytoprep
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Cytoprep Inc. Est. · HHI System, Abortion, Vacuum
Cleared on Nov 16, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K930955 (Rovers B.V., 1994) and 1 other predicate after a 66-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994.
- Decided
- Nov 16, 1998
- Review
- 66 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HHI
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K915844 (1994). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK915844 Exact-TouchBaal Assoc., Inc. · 1994
- This deviceK983181 CytoprepCytoprep Inc. Est. · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K915844 | Exact-Touch | Baal Assoc., Inc. | 1994 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K983181 | Cytoprep | Cytoprep Inc. Est. | 1998 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HHI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K930955 | Cervex-BrushSummary page 1…® TRADE NAME: CYTOPREP® COMMON NAME;: Cervical Brush CLASSIFICATION NAME: Spatula, Cervical, Cytological (per 21 CFR 884.4530) CLAIMING EQUIVELANCE TO: Cervex-Brush® (K930955) and Exact Touch (K915844) DESCRIPTION OF cyrTOoOPREFPQ: CYTOPREP® consists of two parts, the handle and the head. The handle i… | 1994 |
| * | K915844 | Exact-TouchSummary page 1…OMMON NAME;: Cervical Brush CLASSIFICATION NAME: Spatula, Cervical, Cytological (per 21 CFR 884.4530) CLAIMING EQUIVELANCE TO: Cervex-Brush® (K930955) and Exact Touch (K915844) DESCRIPTION OF cyrTOoOPREFPQ: CYTOPREP® consists of two parts, the handle and the head. The handle is 214mm in length, cylindr… | 1994 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
- 2 other devices also cite its predicate K930955.
How does its category compare?
All HHI devicesHHI System, Abortion, Vacuum: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · HHI
1in 2017
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HHI
Too few HHI 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · HHI
1in 2019
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HHI
3in 2024
MAUDE reports naming product code HHI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 1 | 6 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The device is used to sample the cervix of patients for the purpose of obtaining ecto-cervical, endo-cervical and T-zone sample cells. These sample cells are used for the “PAP” test.
While the product is designed to be used in conjunction with liquid based cytology procedure (monolayer method), it can also be used in conjunction with the traditional “PAP” test procedure.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K983181 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K983181: Cytoprep.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983181
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026