510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Small Vaginal/Rectal Electrode

K983206510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 3, 199850-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5320

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Empi · KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence

Cleared on Nov 3, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K952688 (Empi, 1995) and 3 other predicates after a 50-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1989.

Decided
Nov 3, 1998
Review
50 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPI
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K891773 (1989). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK891773 Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin IncontiHollister, Inc. · 1989
  2. 2 generations backK954272 Innova Rectal Stimulaton ElectrodeEmpi · 1996
  3. 1 generation backK964577 Innova Comfortpulse Vaginal Electrode (199204)/Innova Comfortpulse…Empi · 1997
  4. This deviceK983206 Small Vaginal/Rectal ElectrodeEmpi · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K891773Microgyn II Elec Stim Device Treat of Urin IncontiHollister, Inc.1989—
−2K954272Innova Rectal Stimulaton ElectrodeEmpi1996—
−1K964577Innova Comfortpulse Vaginal Electrode (199204)/Innova Comfortpulse Small…Empi1997—
0 (this device)K983206Small Vaginal/Rectal ElectrodeEmpi1998—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199410
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983206, 1989–1998Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KPI device

  1. #1 K262353 BTL-299-Fscore 14.8 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K952688Innova Rectal or Small Vaginal Emg Sensing Electrode
Summary page 1
…ectal Stimulaiion Electrode Common Name: Pelvic Floor Stimulation Device B. Name of Predicate Devices ¢ Empi, Inc. Innova Rectal or Small Vaginal EMG Sensing Electrode K952688 e Empi, Inc. Innova Rectal Stimulation Electrode K954272 e Innova® ComfortPulse™ Vaginal Electrodes (Small and Std.) K964577 e In…
Empi1995—
*K954272Innova Rectal Stimulaton Electrode
Summary page 1
…mulation Device B. Name of Predicate Devices ¢ Empi, Inc. Innova Rectal or Small Vaginal EMG Sensing Electrode K952688 e Empi, Inc. Innova Rectal Stimulation Electrode K954272 e Innova® ComfortPulse™ Vaginal Electrodes (Small and Std.) K964577 e Innova® Vaginal Electrode K940091 C. Device Description Th…
Empi1996—
*K964577Innova Comfortpulse Vaginal Electrode (199204)/Innova Comfortpulse Small Vaginal…
Summary page 1
…ctal or Small Vaginal EMG Sensing Electrode K952688 e Empi, Inc. Innova Rectal Stimulation Electrode K954272 e Innova® ComfortPulse™ Vaginal Electrodes (Small and Std.) K964577 e Innova® Vaginal Electrode K940091 C. Device Description The Small Vaginal and Rectal Stimulation Electrode is identical in des…
Empi1997—
*K940091Innova Vaginal Emg Sensing Electrode
Summary page 1
…lectrode K952688 e Empi, Inc. Innova Rectal Stimulation Electrode K954272 e Innova® ComfortPulse™ Vaginal Electrodes (Small and Std.) K964577 e Innova® Vaginal Electrode K940091 C. Device Description The Small Vaginal and Rectal Stimulation Electrode is identical in design to the predicate rectal electrod…
Empi1994—

Also cleared against K952688: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K952688.

How does its category compare?

All KPI devices

KPI Stimulator, Electrical, Non-Implantable, For Incontinence: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KPI

7so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 12009: 22011: 12012: 22013: 12014: 32015: 62016: 32017: 12018: 32019: 22020: 12021: 32022: 32023: 32024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 7
2007high 7 (2026) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPI

263in 2025

2014: 57 days median2015: 260 days median2016: 89 days median2018: 304 days median2021: 217 days median2022: 181 days median2023: 197 days median2024: 172 days median2025: 263 days median2026 (partial year): 248 days median
2007high 304 (2018) · low 57 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KPI

No recall names KPI since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KPI

2in 2024

2013: 12015: 22017: 42019: 22020: 32021: 12022: 22023: 62024: 2
2007high 6 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20081—00
20092—00
20100—00
20111—00
20122—00
20131—01
201435700
2015626002
201638900
20171—04
2018330400
20192—02
20201—03
2021321701
2022318102
2023319706
2024417202
2025426300
202672480—

What is it indicated for?

The electrode is indicated for pelvic floor stimulation use in the treatment of urinary incontinence and monitors and allows assessment of EMG activity of the pelvic floor muscles. The electrode can be used either vaginally and rectally; it should not be interchanged between the two positions. The electrode is reusable between patients if reuse instructions are followed.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983206: Small Vaginal/Rectal Electrode.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983206

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026