510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2018

APOB

K983281510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 26, 1999130-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.5600Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Abbott Laboratories · DFC Lipoprotein, Low-Density, Antigen, Antiserum, Control

Cleared on Jan 26, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K964296 (Crestat Diagnostics, Inc., 1997) after a 130-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1997. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jan 26, 1999
Review
130 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DFC
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K964296 (1997). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K964296 · N-Assay Tia Apo B Test Kit · Crestat Diagnostics, Inc. · 1997199619982000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK964296 N-Assay Tia Apo B Test KitCrestat Diagnostics, Inc. · 1997
  2. This deviceK983281 APOBAbbott Laboratories · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K964296N-Assay Tia Apo B Test KitCrestat Diagnostics, Inc.1997—
0 (this device)K983281APOBAbbott Laboratories1999—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983281, 1997–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DFC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DFC device

  1. #1 K253069 Lipoprotein (a) Molarity Assayscore 11.5 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K964296N-Assay Tia Apo B Test Kit
Summary page 2
…I September 17, 1998 Page 1 ApoB_Vl1lwp 0000011 Substantial Equivalence: The Apolipoprotein B assay is substantially equivalent to the K-ASSAY® Apo B (K964296/8022) on the Hitachi® 717 Analyzer. Both assays yield similar Performance Characteristics. Similarities: » Both assays are in v…
Crestat Diagnostics, Inc.1997—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 16, 2018Class IIZ-1994-2019Under Investigation by firmAn update to the Reagents and Specimen Collection and Handling/Preparation for Analysis sections of the IFU was required due to different issues with the various products.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All DFC devices

DFC Lipoprotein, Low-Density, Antigen, Antiserum, Control: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DFC

1in 2025

2007: 12009: 12012: 22018: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DFC

Too few DFC 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DFC

2in 2024

2012: 12024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DFC

7in 2025

2016: 12023: 62024: 162025: 7
2007high 16 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DFC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20091—00
20100—00
20110—00
20122—10
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—01
20170—00
20181—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20221—00
20230—06
20240—216
20251—07
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Apolipoprotein B assay is used for the quantitation of apolipoprotein B in human serum or plasma. Apolipoprotein B meaurements are useful in the diagnosis of premature coronary artery disease, hyper-b-lipoproteinemia, and hypo-b-lipoproteinemia.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983281: APOB.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983281

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026