510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IN-Probe II Urodynamic System

K983325510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 24, 199863-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1620

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Influence, Inc. · FEN Device, Cystometric, Hydraulic

Cleared on Nov 24, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K940812 (Andronic Devices, Ltd., 1994) after a 63-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994.

Decided
Nov 24, 1998
Review
63 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FEN
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K940812 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K940812 · Insight Electronic Alignment Indicator · Andronic Devices, Ltd. · 1994199019921994199619982000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK940812 Insight Electronic Alignment IndicatorAndronic Devices, Ltd. · 1994
  2. This deviceK983325 IN-Probe II Urodynamic SystemInfluence, Inc. · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K940812Insight Electronic Alignment IndicatorAndronic Devices, Ltd.1994—
0 (this device)K983325IN-Probe II Urodynamic SystemInfluence, Inc.1998—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983325, 1994–1998Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FEN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FEN device

  1. #1 K212830 CT3000Proscore 2.9 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K940812Insight Electronic Alignment Indicator
Summary page 1
…Urodynamics System has an angle sensor that is substantially equivalent technologically to Andronic Devices, Ltd.’s Insight electronic alignment indicator cleared under K940812, and to the preamendments Q-tip test in terms of intended use. Indication for Use: The In-Probe II Urodynamic System is indicat…
Andronic Devices, Ltd.1994—
*—In-Probe Urodynamics System
Named without a submission number
—
*—pre-amendments Q-tip test
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All FEN devices

FEN Device, Cystometric, Hydraulic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FEN

1in 2021

2008: 22021: 1
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FEN

Too few FEN 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FEN

No recall names FEN since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · FEN

3in 2024

2009: 12012: 12013: 102014: 112015: 332016: 102017: 32018: 22019: 62021: 12022: 32023: 32024: 3
2007high 33 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FEN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20082—00
20090—01
20100—00
20110—00
20120—01
20130—010
20140—011
20150—033
20160—010
20170—03
20180—02
20190—06
20200—00
20211—01
20220—03
20230—03
20240—03
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The In-Probe II Urodynamic System is indicated as an aid in the diagnosis of voiding dysfunction in males and females. In females, the In-Probe II Urodynamic System is also indicated for measuring urethral angle during straining.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983325: IN-Probe II Urodynamic System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983325

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026