510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SCS Spinal System

K983353510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 18, 199886-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Orthotec, Inc. · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Dec 18, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K974749 (Cross Medical Products, Inc., 1998) and 2 other predicates after an 86-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1990. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 18, 1998
Review
86 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K901587 (1990). 15 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1995: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor1993: 2 other ancestors1992: 5 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 descendant cleared2000: 1 descendant clearedK901587 · TSRH Sacral L-Connector · Danek Medical, Inc. · 1990K950099 · Synergy (TM) TI Posterior Spinal System · Buckman Co., Inc. · 1997×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K973836 (1998), K974749 (1998) 1990200020102020
  1. Root · 4 generations backK901587 TSRH Sacral L-ConnectorDanek Medical, Inc. · 1990
  2. 3 generations backK950099 Synergy (TM) TI Posterior Spinal SystemBuckman Co., Inc. · 1997
  3. 2 generations backK973836 Synergy 6.35MM SS Rod with Screws for Anterior Use, Part of the…Cross Medical Products, Inc. · 1998
  4. 1 generation backK974749 Synergy Closed Variable Locking Screw (VLS), Part of the Cross…Cross Medical Products, Inc. · 1998
  5. This deviceK983353 SCS Spinal SystemOrthotec, Inc. · 1998
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK994288 5.0MM Spinal ScrewsOrtho Tec, LLC · 2000
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK993926 Omniaxial ConnectorOrtho Tec, LLC · 1999

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K9942885.0MM Spinal ScrewsOrtho Tec, LLC · 2000 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K993926Omniaxial ConnectorOrtho Tec, LLC · 1999 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K901587TSRH Sacral L-ConnectorDanek Medical, Inc.1990—
−3K950099Synergy (TM) TI Posterior Spinal SystemBuckman Co., Inc.1997—
−2K973836Synergy 6.35MM SS Rod with Screws for Anterior Use, Part of the Cross…Cross Medical Products, Inc.1998—
−1K974749Synergy Closed Variable Locking Screw (VLS), Part of the Cross Medical-Synergy…Cross Medical Products, Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K983353SCS Spinal SystemOrthotec, Inc.1998—
+1K9942885.0MM Spinal ScrewsOrtho Tec, LLC2000—
+1K993926Omniaxial ConnectorOrtho Tec, LLC1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199010
199250
199320
199410
199520

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983353, 1990–2000Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974749Synergy Closed Variable Locking Screw (VLS), Part of the Cross Medical-Synergy Anterior…
Summary page 3
…5 of 11 kqa¥33%3 3stS From: Dr. Patrick Bertranou @YTo: Paul Williams FDA Date: 12/18/1998 T'me: 1£:28:56 AM 4, Equivalent Predicate Device: Synergy™ Spinal System: K974749, K950709 & K950099 — Cross Medical Products, Inc. The Synergy™ Spinal System is cleared for marketing as a system described in a…
Cross Medical Products, Inc.1998—
*K950709Synergy TI Anterior Spinal System
Summary page 3
…kqa¥33%3 3stS From: Dr. Patrick Bertranou @YTo: Paul Williams FDA Date: 12/18/1998 T'me: 1£:28:56 AM 4, Equivalent Predicate Device: Synergy™ Spinal System: K974749, K950709 & K950099 — Cross Medical Products, Inc. The Synergy™ Spinal System is cleared for marketing as a system described in all of the…
Cross Medical Products, Inc.1995—
*K950099Synergy (TM) TI Posterior Spinal System
Summary page 3
…3stS From: Dr. Patrick Bertranou @YTo: Paul Williams FDA Date: 12/18/1998 T'me: 1£:28:56 AM 4, Equivalent Predicate Device: Synergy™ Spinal System: K974749, K950709 & K950099 — Cross Medical Products, Inc. The Synergy™ Spinal System is cleared for marketing as a system described in all of the following…
Buckman Co., Inc.1997—

Also cleared against K974749: 19 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K9942885.0MM Spinal ScrewsOrtho Tec, LLC20000
K993926Omniaxial ConnectorOrtho Tec, LLC19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.1 years on median.
  • None of the 15 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K994288 (Ortho Tec, LLC, 2000) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 19 other devices also cite its predicate K974749.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a nonpedicle posterior system, the SCS system is indicated for patients with: degenerative disk disease defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies spondylolisthesis fracture spinal stenosis deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis) tumors pseudarthrosis failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis) The system is indicated for thoracic, lumbar and sacral level. When…

Read the full statement (248 words)

When used as a nonpedicle posterior system, the SCS system is indicated for patients with:

degenerative disk disease defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies

spondylolisthesis

fracture

spinal stenosis

deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis)

tumors

pseudarthrosis

failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis)

The system is indicated for thoracic, lumbar and sacral level.

When used as an anterolateral/anterior system the SCS system is indicated for patients with:

degenerative disk disease defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies

spondylolisthesis

fracture

spinal stenosis

deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis)

tumors

pseudarthrosis

failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis)

The system is indicated for thoracic and lumbar level.

When used as a posterior pedicle system, the device is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients who are:

having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5-S1 joint

receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only

having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine

having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass.

Screw fixation is limited to L3 and below.

Posterior pedicle systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine:

degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment

fracture

dislocation

scoliosis

kyphosis

spinal tumor

failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis)

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983353: SCS Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983353

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026