510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Auto Suture Site Marker Clip

K983400510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 10, 1999135-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

United States Surgical, A Division of Tyco Healthc · GDW Staple, Implantable

Cleared on Feb 10, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K970817 (Biopsys Medical, Inc., 1997) after a 135-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1997. 35 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 10, 1999
Review
135 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GDW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K970817 (1997). 35 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 descendant cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2012: 5 descendants cleared2010: 2 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2017: 4 descendants cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2014: 3 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant clearedK970817 · Micromark Clip · Biopsys Medical, Inc. · 19971995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 5 descendants4 generations forward: 15 descendants5 generations forward: 9 descendants6 generations forward: 1 descendant K970817 · Micromark Clip · Biopsys Medical, Inc. · 19970+5
  1. Root · 1 generation backK970817 Micromark ClipBiopsys Medical, Inc. · 1997
  2. This deviceK983400 Auto Suture Site Marker ClipUnited States Surgical, A Division of Tyco Healthc · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 21 of its ownK022326 Radiomed MarkerRadiomed Corporation · 2003
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 20 of its ownK031206 Radiomed Soft Tissue MarkerRadiomed Corp. · 2003
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 12 of its ownK012955 Coaptite Tissue Marker and Coaptite FN Tissue MarkerBioform, Inc. · 2001
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 11 of its ownK070305 Pre-Loaded VisicoilRadiomed Corporation · 2007
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 10 of its ownK072219 Cytophil Tissue MarkerCytophil, Inc. · 2008

Showing 5 of 35 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2001: 12003: 22007: 22008: 22009: 12010: 22011: 12012: 52013: 32014: 32015: 32016: 12017: 42018: 12020: 12022: 12024: 12025: 1
2001high 5 (2012) · low 0 (2002)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 35 · See all
  • K022326Radiomed MarkerRadiomed Corporation · 2003 · cites it directly21descendants
  • K031206Radiomed Soft Tissue MarkerRadiomed Corp. · 2003 · 2 generations on20descendants
  • K012955Coaptite Tissue Marker and Coaptite FN Tissue MarkerBioform, Inc. · 2001 · cites it directly12descendants
  • K070305Pre-Loaded VisicoilRadiomed Corporation · 2007 · 3 generations on11descendants
  • K072219Cytophil Tissue MarkerCytophil, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations on10descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K970817Micromark ClipBiopsys Medical, Inc.1997—
0 (this device)K983400Auto Suture Site Marker ClipUnited States Surgical, A Division of Tyco Healthc1999—
+1K022326Radiomed MarkerRadiomed Corporation2003—
+2K031206Radiomed Soft Tissue MarkerRadiomed Corp.2003—
+1K012955Coaptite Tissue Marker and Coaptite FN Tissue MarkerBioform, Inc.2001—
+3K070305Pre-Loaded VisicoilRadiomed Corporation2007—
+2K072219Cytophil Tissue MarkerCytophil, Inc.2008—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200320
200720
200820
200910
201020
201110
201250
201330
201430
201530
201610
201740
201810
202010
202210
202410
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983400, 1997–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GDW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GDW device

  1. #1 K253657 Tri-staple 2.0™ Reloads; Endo GIA™ Reloads…score 15.0 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K970817Micromark Clip
Summary page 1
…2, 1998 CLASSIFICATION NAME: Implantable Staple COMMON NAME: Implantable Staple PROPRIETARY NAME: Auto Suture* Site Marker** staple PREDICATE DEVICES: MicroMark™ clip (K970817) DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The Auto Suture* Site Marker** staple, is a single use disposable staple, which consists of a non-absorbab…
Biopsys Medical, Inc.1997—

Also cleared against K970817: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (35)

See all 35

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K022326Radiomed MarkerRadiomed Corporation200321
K012955Coaptite Tissue Marker and Coaptite FN Tissue MarkerBioform, Inc.200112

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K022326 (Radiomed Corporation, 2003) has gone furthest, with 21 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K970817.

How does its category compare?

All GDW devices

GDW Staple, Implantable: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GDW

3in 2025

2007: 82008: 72009: 132010: 102011: 112012: 92013: 132014: 152015: 82016: 112017: 132018: 72019: 122020: 102021: 92022: 72023: 42024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 15 (2014) · low 2 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GDW

111in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 57 days median2009: 27 days median2010: 39 days median2011: 49 days median2012: 45 days median2013: 49 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 96 days median2017: 103 days median2018: 90 days median2019: 205 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 233 days median2022: 89 days median2023: 267 days median2025: 111 days median2026 (partial year): 141 days median
2007high 267 (2023) · low 27 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GDW

3in 2025

2007: 92009: 222010: 22011: 92012: 11, 1 Class I2013: 12015: 62016: 22017: 32018: 32019: 4, 4 Class I2020: 112023: 12025: 3
2007high 22 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (5 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GDW

11,905in 2025

2007: 2,4012008: 2,3802009: 4,0142010: 3,7682011: 3,8262012: 3,7172013: 3,7772014: 4,7842015: 4,8992016: 5,1062017: 11,6432018: 14,9142019: 16,6002020: 12,3322021: 13,0152022: 13,6052023: 14,6232024: 13,2802025: 11,905
2007high 16,600 (2019) · low 2,380 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GDW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200785692,401
200875702,380
20091327224,014
2010103923,768
2011114993,826
201294511 (1)3,717
2013134913,777
2014156304,784
2015811164,899
2016119625,106
201713103311,643
2018790314,914
2019122054 (4)16,600
202010881112,332
20219233013,015
2022789013,605
20234267114,623
20242—013,280
20253111311,905
202631410—

What is it indicated for?

The Auto Suture* Site Marker** staple is intended for use in soft tissue during an open or

percutaneous biopsy procedure to radiographically mark the biopsy location.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983400: Auto Suture Site Marker Clip.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983400

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026