510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2016

Bard Inlay Lubricious Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent with Suture (Hereinafter Referred to as Bard Lubricious Ureteral Ste

K983498510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Dec 15, 199871-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.4620Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

C.R. Bard, Inc. · FAD Stent, Ureteral

Cleared on Dec 15, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K903345 (C.R. Bard, Inc., 1991) after a 71-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991. 16 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Dec 15, 1998
Review
71 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FAD
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K903345 (1991). 16 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2025: 3 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant clearedK903345 · Bard (R) Lubricious - Coated Ureteral Stent Suture · C.R. Bard, Inc. · 19911990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 5 descendants4 generations forward: 6 descendants K903345 · Bard (R) Lubricious - Coated Ureteral Stent Suture · C.R. Bard, Inc. · 19910
  1. Root · 1 generation backK903345 Bard (R) Lubricious - Coated Ureteral Stent SutureC.R. Bard, Inc. · 1991
  2. This deviceK983498 Bard Inlay Lubricious Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent with Suture…C.R. Bard, Inc. · 1998
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 14 of its ownK022447 Bard ER Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2003
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 12 of its ownK043193 Bard Inlayoptima Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 11 of its ownK151051 Universa Soft Ureteral Stents and Stent SetsCook Incorporated · 2016 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 5 of its ownK161236 Universa Firm Ureteral Stents and Stent SetsCook Incorporated · 2017 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK190312 Dornier Ureteral StentDornier Medtech America, Inc. · 2019

Showing 5 of 16 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2003: 12004: 12016: 12017: 22018: 32019: 12022: 22024: 12025: 32026: 1
2003high 3 (2018) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 16 · See all
  • K022447Bard ER Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2003 · cites it directly14descendants
  • K043193Bard Inlayoptima Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2004 · 2 generations on12descendants
  • K151051Universa Soft Ureteral Stents and Stent SetsCook Incorporated · 2016 · 3 generations on11descendants
  • K161236Universa Firm Ureteral Stents and Stent SetsCook Incorporated · 2017 · 3 generations on5descendants
  • K190312Dornier Ureteral StentDornier Medtech America, Inc. · 2019 · cites it directly3descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K903345Bard (R) Lubricious - Coated Ureteral Stent SutureC.R. Bard, Inc.1991—
0 (this device)K983498Bard Inlay Lubricious Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent with Suture (Hereinafter…C.R. Bard, Inc.1998—
+1K022447Bard ER Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc.2003—
+2K043193Bard Inlayoptima Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc.20046
+3K151051Universa Soft Ureteral Stents and Stent SetsCook Incorporated20162
+3K161236Universa Firm Ureteral Stents and Stent SetsCook Incorporated20171
+1K190312Dornier Ureteral StentDornier Medtech America, Inc.2019—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200410
201610
201720
201830
201910
202220
202410
202530
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983498, 1991–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FAD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FAD device

  1. #1 K251890 Disposable Ureteral Stentsscore 12.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K903345Bard (R) Lubricious - Coated Ureteral Stent Suture
Summary page 2
…al Characteristics Bard Lubricious Ureteral Stent Bard Lubricious-Coated Ureteral Difference Product Characteristic (this 510(k)) Stent with Suture (Predicate device) (#K903345) Stent Indications or Intended The Bard Lubricious Ureteral Stent is The Bard Lubricious-Coated Ureteral None Use indicated to re…
C.R. Bard, Inc.1991—

What descends from it? (16)

See all 16

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K022447Bard ER Ureteral Stent with SutureC.R. Bard, Inc.200314
K190312Dornier Ureteral StentDornier Medtech America, Inc.20193

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 13, 2016Class IIZ-0406-2017Labeling Change ControlLabeling: Statement was added to the Warnings/Precautions section requesting end users to consider the presence of a knot if significant resistance is encountered during attempts at removal.
Oct 13, 2016Class IIZ-0404-2017Labeling Change ControlLabeling: Statement was added to the Warnings/Precautions section requesting end users to consider the presence of a knot if significant resistance is encountered during attempts at removal.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K022447 (C.R. Bard, Inc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 14 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All FAD devices

FAD Stent, Ureteral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 12010: 12014: 12016: 42017: 82018: 92019: 52020: 12021: 22022: 52024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2018) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FAD

186in 2025

2016: 143 days median2017: 266 days median2018: 258 days median2019: 263 days median2022: 143 days median2025: 186 days median
2007high 266 (2017) · low 143 (2016)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 222009: 22010: 12016: 42019: 62020: 22021: 12022: 92025: 4
2007high 22 (2008) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FAD

634in 2025

2007: 432008: 762009: 1232010: 782011: 952012: 1312013: 822014: 782015: 1302016: 1822017: 2652018: 2772019: 2612020: 3522021: 5312022: 5592023: 6912024: 6032025: 634
2007high 691 (2023) · low 43 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FAD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20081—2276
20090—2123
20101—178
20110—095
20120—0131
20130—082
20141—078
20150—0130
201641434182
201782660265
201892580277
201952636261
20201—2352
20212—1531
202251439559
20230—0691
20241—0603
202541864634
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Bard Lubricious Ureteral Stent is indicated to relieve obstruction in a variety of benign, malignant and post-traumatic conditions in the ureter such as presence of stones and/or stone fragments, or other ureteral obstructions such as those associated with ureteral stricture, carcinoma of abdominal organs, retroperitoneal fibrosis or ureteral trauma, or in association with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). The stent may be placed using endoscopic surgical techniques or percutaneously using standard radiographic technique.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983498: Bard Inlay Lubricious Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent with Suture (Hereinafter Referred to as Bard Lubricious Ureteral Ste.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983498

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026