510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Aztech 70

K984524510(k) SpecialCleared Jan 14, 199924-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.1800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Villa Sistemi Medicali S.P.A. · EHD Unit, X-Ray, Extraoral With Timer

Cleared on Jan 14, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K950667 (Chicago X-Ray Systems, Inc., 1995) after a 24-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jan 14, 1999
Review
24 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EHD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K950667 (1995). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant clearedK950667 · Aztech 65 with CCD (Computer Controlled Density) Timer · Chicago X-Ray Systems, Inc. · 19951995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K950667 · Aztech 65 with CCD (Computer Controlled Density) Timer · Chicago X-Ray Systems, Inc. · 19950
  1. Root · 1 generation backK950667 Aztech 65 with CCD (Computer Controlled Density) TimerChicago X-Ray Systems, Inc. · 1995
  2. This deviceK984524 Aztech 70Villa Sistemi Medicali S.P.A. · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK030185 Endos AC/AcpVilla Sistemi Medicali S.P.A. · 2003

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K030185Endos AC/AcpVilla Sistemi Medicali S.P.A. · 2003 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K950667Aztech 65 with CCD (Computer Controlled Density) TimerChicago X-Ray Systems, Inc.1995—
0 (this device)K984524Aztech 70Villa Sistemi Medicali S.P.A.1999—
+1K030185Endos AC/AcpVilla Sistemi Medicali S.P.A.2003—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K984524, 1995–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EHD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EHD device

  1. #1 K260795 Hand-held Dental X-ray System (HyperLight-M)score 14.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K950667Aztech 65 with CCD (Computer Controlled Density) Timer
Summary page 1
…00, Aztech 70 device is in Class I1. Substantial equivalent device: the proposed equipment is defined as Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the Aztech 65 with CCD timer (K950667). This assumption 1s based on the comparison table contained on the following page. Aztech 65 with CCD Timer (K9…
Chicago X-Ray Systems, Inc.1995—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K030185Endos AC/AcpVilla Sistemi Medicali S.P.A.20030

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K030185 (Villa Sistemi Medicali S.P.A., 2003) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EHD devices

EHD Unit, X-Ray, Extraoral With Timer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EHD

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 52009: 42010: 42011: 32012: 22013: 42014: 32015: 12016: 22017: 42018: 52019: 42020: 22021: 12022: 82023: 82024: 72025: 12026 (partial year): 6
2007high 8 (2022) · low 1 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EHD

58in 2024

2008: 49 days median2009: 92 days median2010: 268 days median2011: 102 days median2013: 216 days median2014: 107 days median2017: 28 days median2018: 30 days median2019: 173 days median2022: 58 days median2023: 147 days median2024: 58 days median2026 (partial year): 128 days median
2007high 268 (2010) · low 28 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EHD

1in 2017

2010: 32011: 32014: 12016: 12017: 1
2007high 3 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EHD

6in 2024

2007: 52008: 62009: 382010: 472011: 262012: 222013: 212014: 202015: 1102016: 632017: 662018: 212019: 212020: 42021: 42022: 42023: 22024: 6
2007high 110 (2015) · low 0 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EHD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—05
200854906
2009492038
20104268347
20113102326
20122—022
20134216021
20143107120
20151—0110
20162—163
2017428166
2018530021
20194173021
20202—04
20211—04
202285804
2023814702
202475806
20251—00
202661280—

What is it indicated for?

The Aztech 70 is intended for extra oral source X-ray system for dental radiographic examination and diagnosis of deseases of the teeth.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K984524: Aztech 70.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K984524

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026