510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Amorphous Diamond Coated Drill

K990846510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 10, 199987-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.4120Recalls 15

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · DZI Drill, Bone, Powered

Cleared on Jun 10, 1999 after an 87-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 15 times.

Decided
Jun 10, 1999
Review
87 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DZI
Recalls
15
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK990846 Amorphous Diamond Coated DrillNobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK071352 CeradrillGebr. Brasseler GmbH & Co. KG · 2007

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K071352CeradrillGebr. Brasseler GmbH & Co. KG · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K990846Amorphous Diamond Coated DrillNobel Biocare Uas, Inc.1999—
+1K071352CeradrillGebr. Brasseler GmbH & Co. KG2007—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990846, 1999–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DZI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DZI device

  1. #1 K253776 Implantmed Plus II & Piezomed Plus II Modulescore 12.1 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Nobel Biocare USA, Inc. Steri-Oss System Surgical Drill
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K071352CeradrillGebr. Brasseler GmbH & Co. KG20070

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1304-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1305-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1323-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1307-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1313-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1310-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1312-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1314-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1315-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1303-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1311-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1308-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1309-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Mar 14, 2019Class IIZ-1306-2020Packaging process controlDue to a problem in the packaging sealing process at the supplier of the affected devices, it cannot be guaranteed that the sterilized medical devices in the scope of this recall remain sterile during their shelf-life.
Jul 20, 2016Class IIZ-2375-2016Labeling designIncorrect drill protocol in the Instructions for Use (IFU)

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K071352 (Gebr. Brasseler GmbH & Co. KG, 2007) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DZI devices

DZI Drill, Bone, Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DZI

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 42009: 52011: 22012: 42014: 12015: 32016: 12018: 32020: 32023: 12024: 22025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DZI

300in 2020

2008: 171 days median2009: 220 days median2012: 191 days median2015: 123 days median2018: 290 days median2020: 300 days median
2007high 300 (2020) · low 123 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DZI

1in 2009

2009: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DZI

39in 2025

2007: 532008: 452009: 222010: 152011: 422012: 252013: 572014: 502015: 392016: 432017: 382018: 732019: 502020: 552021: 842022: 632023: 632024: 582025: 39
2007high 84 (2021) · low 15 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DZI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—053
20084171045
20095220122
20100—015
20112—042
20124191025
20130—057
20141—050
20153123039
20161—043
20170—038
20183290073
20190—050
20203300055
20210—084
20220—063
20231—063
20242—058
20251—039
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The intended use for this device is to cut into the maxilla or mandible to create an

osteotomy for endosseous dental implant placement. The amorphous diamond

coated drill design is intended to minimize corrosion and to increase longevity of

the tool.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990846: Amorphous Diamond Coated Drill.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990846

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026