510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Steco-Titanmagnetics

K990979510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 3, 1999164-day reviewClass I21 CFR 872.3165

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Steco-System-Technik GmbH & Cokg · EGG Attachment, Precision, All

Cleared on Sep 3, 1999 after a 164-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

Decided
Sep 3, 1999
Review
164 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EGG
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990979Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EGG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All EGG devices

EGG Attachment, Precision, All: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EGG

FDA has decided no EGG device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · EGG

Too few EGG 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · EGG

1in 2008

2008: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EGG

1in 2010

2010: 1
2007high 1 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EGG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—10
20090—00
20100—01
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

General:

Titanmagnetics are allowed to be used only in responsibility of a physician, dentist or maxillo-facial surgeon for following indications:

Gero-prosthetics

Magnet attachment adaptable to different implants or root caps (post).

Anchoring of hybrid and partial dentures in category n° III (toothless jaw) and category n° IIc (very few teeth left). The classification is according to the BDIZ-Expert Committee 1997.

For lower jaw (mandible) treatments belonging to category n° III; at least 2 to 4 implants shall be inserted, in the upper jaw (maxilla) at least 3 or 4 implants.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990979: Steco-Titanmagnetics.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990979

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026