510(k) · Cleared
ClearedShadow Trays
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Mick Radio-Nuclear Instruments, Inc. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical
Cleared on Jun 29, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K944315 (Medtec, Inc., 1994) after an 89-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Jun 29, 1999
- Review
- 89 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- IYE
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K944315 (1994). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K023636Blocking TraySoutheastern Radiation Products, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K944315 | Blocking Tray | Medtec, Inc. | 1994 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K991107 | Shadow Trays | Mick Radio-Nuclear Instruments, Inc. | 1999 | — |
| +1 | K023636 | Blocking Tray | Southeastern Radiation Products, Inc. | 2002 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device
- #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K944315 | Blocking TraySummary page 1…icant Name and Address: Mick Radio-Nuclear Instruments, Inc. 1470 Outlook Avenue Bronx, New York 10465 Name of Predicate Devices: (1) MED-TEC, Inc. Beam Blocking Trays (K944315) Classification This device is classified as a class II device according to 21 CFR 892.5050 Performance Standards Performance… | 1994 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K023636 | Blocking Tray | 2002 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All IYE devicesIYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · IYE
12in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · IYE
170in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · IYE
1in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · IYE
101in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 23 | 44 | 78 | 155 |
| 2008 | 14 | 69 | 49 | 114 |
| 2009 | 20 | 63 | 22 | 174 |
| 2010 | 23 | 74 | 27 | 246 |
| 2011 | 11 | 94 | 73 | 280 |
| 2012 | 28 | 106 | 20 | 128 |
| 2013 | 18 | 88 | 11 | 96 |
| 2014 | 20 | 100 | 14 | 124 |
| 2015 | 20 | 108 | 8 | 100 |
| 2016 | 21 | 97 | 7 | 97 |
| 2017 | 23 | 94 | 7 | 125 |
| 2018 | 21 | 58 | 7 | 85 |
| 2019 | 19 | 83 | 2 | 91 |
| 2020 | 20 | 67 | 4 | 74 |
| 2021 | 19 | 86 | 5 | 68 |
| 2022 | 12 | 172 | 3 | 66 |
| 2023 | 18 | 129 | 7 | 128 |
| 2024 | 9 | 239 | 1 | 81 |
| 2025 | 12 | 170 | 1 | 101 |
| 2026 | 14 | 120 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
In Radiation Therapy, it is often necessary to create irregularly shaped fields to contour to the desired shape of the treatment volume. Irregular shapes can be achieved by supplementing the shaping ability of the treatment machines collimation system with tertiary beam blocks. These Beam Blocks are used to further collimate and contour the treatment field and are often custom formed from low metling alloys containing lead and other high density metals.…
Read the full statement (118 words)
In Radiation Therapy, it is often necessary to create irregularly shaped fields to contour to the desired shape of the treatment volume. Irregular shapes can be achieved by supplementing the shaping ability of the treatment machines collimation system with tertiary beam blocks. These Beam Blocks are used to further collimate and contour the treatment field and are often custom formed from low metling alloys containing lead and other high density metals. In order to be used, beam blocks must be supported in the path of the incident beam so that the resultant treatment field is properly defined at the patient surface. Shadow Trays provide a simple system for holding the blocks in position for treatment with pre-defined geometry.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K991107 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K991107: Shadow Trays.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K991107
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026