510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Vestogum

K991221510(k) TraditionalCleared May 20, 199938-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Espe Dental AG · ELW Material, Impression

Cleared on May 20, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K954192 (Espe GmbH & Co. Kg., 1995) and 1 other predicate after a 38-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995.

Decided
May 20, 1999
Review
38 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ELW
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K953027 (1995). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestorK953027 · Permadyne Penta (High & Low Viscosity) · Espe GmbH & Co. Kg. · 1995199619982000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K953027 · Permadyne Penta (High & Low Viscosity) · Espe GmbH & Co. Kg. · 19950
  1. Root · 1 generation backK953027 Permadyne Penta (High & Low Viscosity)Espe GmbH & Co. Kg. · 1995
  2. This deviceK991221 VestogumEspe Dental AG · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K953027Permadyne Penta (High & Low Viscosity)Espe GmbH & Co. Kg.1995—
0 (this device)K991221VestogumEspe Dental AG1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K991221, 1995–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ELW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ELW device

  1. #1 K254152 Dia-X Sil Light Bodyscore 14.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K954192Impregum Penta
Summary page 1
….....cccccceenneeeee Impression Material Common Name:.....cccccoevevnrneinceneennn. Gingiva Modeling Material Predicate Device IMPREGUM® PENTA by ESPE................. K 954192 PERMADYNE® PENTA H by ESPE .......... K 953027 Description for the Premarket Notification VESTOGUM® is classified as a dental i…
Espe GmbH & Co. Kg.1995—
*K953027Permadyne Penta (High & Low Viscosity)
Summary page 1
…Name:.....cccccoevevnrneinceneennn. Gingiva Modeling Material Predicate Device IMPREGUM® PENTA by ESPE................. K 954192 PERMADYNE® PENTA H by ESPE .......... K 953027 Description for the Premarket Notification VESTOGUM® is classified as a dental impression material (21 C.F.R. § 872.3660) becau…
Espe GmbH & Co. Kg.1995—

Also cleared against K954192: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K954192.

How does its category compare?

All ELW devices

ELW Material, Impression: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ELW

2in 2025

2007: 72008: 112009: 72010: 52011: 92012: 72013: 52014: 112015: 82016: 72017: 32018: 52019: 22020: 42021: 32022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 3
2007high 11 (2008) · low 2 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ELW

98in 2024

2007: 60 days median2008: 30 days median2009: 43 days median2010: 88 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 67 days median2014: 122 days median2015: 93 days median2016: 166 days median2017: 89 days median2018: 126 days median2020: 99 days median2021: 76 days median2022: 60 days median2024: 98 days median2026 (partial year): 268 days median
2007high 268 (2026) · low 30 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ELW

3in 2016

2010: 12012: 12013: 32016: 3
2007high 3 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ELW

22in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 72010: 162011: 152012: 142013: 322014: 352015: 182016: 152017: 172018: 142019: 242020: 82021: 62022: 92023: 132024: 32025: 22
2007high 35 (2014) · low 3 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ELW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200776009
20081130017
200974307
2010588116
2011983015
2012787114
2013567332
201411122035
2015893018
20167166315
2017389017
20185126014
20192—024
202049908
202137606
202276009
20232—013
202439803
20252—022
202632680—

What is it indicated for?

Gingiva Modeling Material for: Combination works when choosing and mounting the attachment, the papilla is fully preserved Telescopic works the shoulder of the crowns to be cut is indicated according to the gingiva coritour Anterior tooth area with regard to esthetics and periodontal hygienics, the forming possibilities of the interdental spaces are increased Forming of different tooth lengths according to the natural conditions in the patient's mouth…

Read the full statement (116 words)

Gingiva Modeling Material for:

Combination works when choosing and mounting the attachment, the papilla is fully preserved

Telescopic works the shoulder of the crowns to be cut is indicated according to the gingiva coritour

Anterior tooth area with regard to esthetics and periodontal hygienics, the forming possibilities of the interdental spaces are increased

Forming of different tooth lengths according to the natural conditions in the patient's mouth, they can be adapted in anatomically correct way; especially in bridge spans

Color rating of the veneer material the material which is in color adapted to the gingiva, serves for more precise color matching

Controlled modellation the cervical-incisal crown convexity for the protection of the gingival margin'can be controlled

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K991221: Vestogum.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K991221

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026