510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Stapes Prostheses

K991394510(k) SpecialCleared May 18, 199927-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.3450

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Grace Medical, Inc. · ETB Prosthesis, Partial Ossicular Replacement

Cleared on May 18, 1999 after a 27-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 18, 1999
Review
27 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ETB
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK991394 Stapes ProsthesesGrace Medical, Inc. · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK060518 Partial Ossicular Replacement ProsthesesGrace Medical, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K060518Partial Ossicular Replacement ProsthesesGrace Medical, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K991394Stapes ProsthesesGrace Medical, Inc.1999—
+1K060518Partial Ossicular Replacement ProsthesesGrace Medical, Inc.20061

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K991394, 1999–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ETB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ETB device

  1. #1 K241142 mAXIS Stapes Prosthesis, mLOOP Stapes…score 13.2 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K060518Partial Ossicular Replacement ProsthesesGrace Medical, Inc.20060

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K060518 (Grace Medical, Inc., 2006) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ETB devices

ETB Prosthesis, Partial Ossicular Replacement: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ETB

2in 2025

2008: 12013: 22025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ETB

Too few ETB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · ETB

1so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2026 (partial year): 1
2007high 1 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ETB

5in 2025

2008: 52010: 52011: 32012: 32013: 32014: 52015: 22016: 52017: 32019: 62020: 42021: 12022: 62023: 12024: 32025: 5
2007high 6 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ETB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20081—05
20090—00
20100—05
20110—03
20120—03
20132—03
20140—05
20150—02
20160—05
20170—03
20180—00
20190—06
20200—04
20210—01
20220—06
20230—01
20240—03
20252—05
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

Ossicular replacement prostheses are indicated for the functional restoration of the ossicular chain when a conductive hearing loss is present. Indications include:

Chronic middle ear disease

Otosclerosis

Congenital fixation of the stapes

Secondary surgical intervention to correct for a significant and persistent conductive hearing loss from prior otologic surgery

Surgically correctible injury to the middle ear from trauma

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K991394: Stapes Prostheses.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K991394

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026