510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Bistite II SC

K991711510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 7, 199949-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3275

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Tokuyama America, Inc. · EMA Cement, Dental

Cleared on Jul 7, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K933030 (Kuraray Co., 1994) and 2 other predicates after a 49-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1986. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 7, 1999
Review
49 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EMA
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K855211 (1986). 3 ancestors in all. 5 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant clearedK855211 · Panavia EX, a Dental Adhesive · Kuraray Co. · 19861990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant K855211 · Panavia EX, a Dental Adhesive · Kuraray Co. · 19860
  1. Root · 1 generation backK855211 Panavia EX, a Dental AdhesiveKuraray Co. · 1986
  2. This deviceK991711 Bistite II SCTokuyama America, Inc. · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK011685 Bistite II DCTokuyama America, Inc. · 2001
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK150727 EstecemTokuyama Dental Corporation · 2015
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK171226 Tokuyama Universal BondTokuyama Dental Corporation · 2017
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK203760 Tokuyama Universal Bond IITokuyama Dental Corporation · 2021
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK011854 Tokuyama M-BondTokuyama America, Inc. · 2001

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K011685Bistite II DCTokuyama America, Inc. · 2001 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K150727EstecemTokuyama Dental Corporation · 2015 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K171226Tokuyama Universal BondTokuyama Dental Corporation · 2017 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K203760Tokuyama Universal Bond IITokuyama Dental Corporation · 2021 · 4 generations on0descendants
  • K011854Tokuyama M-BondTokuyama America, Inc. · 2001 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K855211Panavia EX, a Dental AdhesiveKuraray Co.1986—
0 (this device)K991711Bistite II SCTokuyama America, Inc.1999—
+1K011685Bistite II DCTokuyama America, Inc.2001—
+2K150727EstecemTokuyama Dental Corporation2015—
+3K171226Tokuyama Universal BondTokuyama Dental Corporation2017—
+4K203760Tokuyama Universal Bond IITokuyama Dental Corporation2021—
+1K011854Tokuyama M-BondTokuyama America, Inc.2001—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199610

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200120
201510
201710
202110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K991711, 1986–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device

  1. #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K933030Panavia 21
Summary page 1
…ceived the approval of the Japanese Government. It is substantially equivalent to various marketed dental cement products, including the following: Panavia 21 (Kurarey) K933030 Panavia Ex (Kurarey) K855211 C&B Metabond (Parkell) K960464 The Use of the product is contra-indicated for patients who are hype…
Kuraray Co.1994—
*K855211Panavia EX, a Dental Adhesive
Summary page 1
…panese Government. It is substantially equivalent to various marketed dental cement products, including the following: Panavia 21 (Kurarey) K933030 Panavia Ex (Kurarey) K855211 C&B Metabond (Parkell) K960464 The Use of the product is contra-indicated for patients who are hypersensitive to methacrylate mo…
Kuraray Co.1986—
*K960464C & B Metabond (Modification)
Summary page 1
…ntially equivalent to various marketed dental cement products, including the following: Panavia 21 (Kurarey) K933030 Panavia Ex (Kurarey) K855211 C&B Metabond (Parkell) K960464 The Use of the product is contra-indicated for patients who are hypersensitive to methacrylate monomers. It should not be allowe…
Parkell, Inc.1996—

Also cleared against K933030: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (5)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K011685Bistite II DCTokuyama America, Inc.20013
K011854Tokuyama M-BondTokuyama America, Inc.20010

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K011685 (Tokuyama America, Inc., 2001) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K933030.

How does its category compare?

All EMA devices

EMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EMA

10in 2025

2007: 62008: 132009: 102010: 142011: 82012: 102013: 122014: 42015: 92016: 102017: 32018: 32019: 72020: 82021: 42022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 102026 (partial year): 7
2007high 14 (2010) · low 2 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EMA

106in 2025

2007: 48 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 86 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 128 days median2013: 178 days median2014: 174 days median2015: 134 days median2016: 182 days median2017: 141 days median2018: 237 days median2019: 127 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 184 days median2022: 245 days median2024: 59 days median2025: 106 days median2026 (partial year): 150 days median
2007high 245 (2022) · low 48 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EMA

1in 2023

2008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 52023: 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EMA

9in 2025

2007: 332008: 502009: 902010: 1062011: 2242012: 2492013: 3852014: 2072015: 852016: 162017: 132018: 42019: 122020: 52021: 82022: 32023: 62024: 52025: 9
2007high 385 (2013) · low 3 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007648033
20081371250
20091086190
201014861106
20118795224
2012101280249
2013121780385
201441740207
20159134085
201610182016
20173141013
2018323704
20197127012
2020816405
2021418408
2022724503
20232—16
202435905
20251010609
202671500—

What is it indicated for?

For use as a dental cement in various applications, including luting, repair of fractured porcelains or crown and bridge resins, cementaiton of adhesive bridge prostheses and CR core posts.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K991711: Bistite II SC.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K991711

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026