510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cardiovascular Workstation, Model CWS 5000/CWS 3000

K992575510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 7, 199966-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Infimed, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Oct 7, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K974086 (Eastman Kodak Company, 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 66-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996.

Decided
Oct 7, 1999
Review
66 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K960043 (1996). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestorK960043 · Kodak Cardiology Digital Archive & Review System · Jamieson Film Co. · 1996199619982000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K960043 · Kodak Cardiology Digital Archive & Review System · Jamieson Film Co. · 19960
  1. Root · 1 generation backK960043 Kodak Cardiology Digital Archive & Review SystemJamieson Film Co. · 1996
  2. This deviceK992575 Cardiovascular Workstation, Model CWS 5000/CWS 3000Infimed, Inc. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K960043Kodak Cardiology Digital Archive & Review SystemJamieson Film Co.1996—
0 (this device)K992575Cardiovascular Workstation, Model CWS 5000/CWS 3000Infimed, Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K992575, 1996–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974086Kodak Digital Science Cardiac Viewer
Summary page 1
…em Classification Name: Picture Archival and Communications System ( as per 892.2050) Predicate substantially equivalent devices: Kodak Digital Science Cardiac Viewer ( K974086) Kodak Digital Science Cardiac Archive and Review System ( K960043) Device Description: The InfiMed Cardiovascular Workstation C…
Eastman Kodak Company1998—
*K960043Kodak Cardiology Digital Archive & Review System
Summary page 1
…( as per 892.2050) Predicate substantially equivalent devices: Kodak Digital Science Cardiac Viewer ( K974086) Kodak Digital Science Cardiac Archive and Review System ( K960043) Device Description: The InfiMed Cardiovascular Workstation CWS 5000 provides digital acquisition and review of DICOM images. Th…
Jamieson Film Co.1996—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The InfiMed Cardiovascular Workstation provides digital acquisition and review of cardiac images. The system can acquire images from a variety of sources (including through DICOM transfer, real-time high resolution 1024 line analog secondary image capture and high speed direct digital connection). Patient images may be stored locally (on hard drive, written to CD-R media and/or networks) or stored to permanent archive, using the DICOM standards. In…

Read the full statement (140 words)

The InfiMed Cardiovascular Workstation provides digital acquisition and review of cardiac images. The system can acquire images from a variety of sources (including through DICOM transfer, real-time high resolution 1024 line analog secondary image capture and high speed direct digital connection). Patient images may be stored locally (on hard drive, written to CD-R media and/or networks) or stored to permanent archive, using the DICOM standards. In addition, the Cardiovascular Workstation provides image review of patient studies in real-time or slow motion, as well as processing and analysis capability. Review functionality also includes multi-modality imaging to support diagnosis and therapy of cardiovascular patients. MR, CT, Nuclear, Ultrasound and CR imaging may be compared to cath lab cardiac and peripheral vascular angiography to enhance clinical analysis and save physician time. Images may be formatted for multi-modality display and printing on laser cameras.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K992575: Cardiovascular Workstation, Model CWS 5000/CWS 3000.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K992575

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026